Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

New Star Trek film is reminder that adults aren’t running Hollywood
Ayn Rand spins in her grave? ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is a bad film
Without peaceful breakup plan, U.S. faces violent, angry collapse
What if a key to knowing what to do is built into everybody’s gut?
Santa checked his list twice — and some of you’ve been naughty
What did you want in childhood? Did you abandon those dreams?
Loving heart, willing spirit can turn burdens of parenting into happiness
‘Black vs. white’ thinking causes confusion without shades of gray
Love & Hope — Episode 2: