Liberal NPR, PBS? Why should tax money pay to influence culture?

By David McElroy · June 28, 2012

The public media community around the country is outraged by the recent firing of two top staffers from Alabama Public Television. The commission that manages the network fired the executive director of APT along with his top assistant. Publicly, both sides just said there was a disagreement about the future direction of the network, but there was much more going on.

Conservatives who control the commission had asked for the network to consider showing a controversial 10-part series by a Texas minister named David Barton who considers himself a historian. (His only educational credential is a degree in religious education from Oral Roberts University.) The American Heritage Series presents this man’s view of the United States as a Christian nation and tries to debunk any notions that the Founding Fathers weren’t dedicated Christians.

The professionals at Alabama Public Television reviewed the material in Barton’s series and outlined why it was a bad idea and possibly illegal. The matter was supposed to be discussed at a commission meeting, but the commission went into executive session and fired the two instead.

At first blush, it seems that the story is simply that conservatives were unjustly trying to push their views onto the professional staff and fired them when they wouldn’t go along. That’s obviously what happened, but there’s a bigger issue here to me.

Why is it that it’s an outrage for conservatives to try to force nutty views onto a tax-funded channel, but it’s not just as much of an outrage that anyone’s views are promoted using tax money?

I love a number of public radio programs. The best two shows on the air today, as far as I’m concerned, are WNYC’s Radiolab and WBEZ’s This American Life. (If you don’t listen to either of them, I highly recommend you start. Both are endlessly fascinating. Subscribe to their podcasts on iTunes and never miss and episode.) In part, they’re funded by tax dollars, which I hate.

When public radio and public television were founded, they were founded on the premise that there was only a niche market for “quality” programming, so government had to make sure it was produced. Even if you buy that argument, we live in a world today where almost everything is a niche. If it was once a justification for taxpayer funding of minority views, it’s no longer a justification. The media market is vibrant. And as more and more things move online, it’s easier than ever to make a minority viewpoint available to the people who want to find it.

I don’t want David Barton’s revisionist history being aired with my tax dollars. The guy is a nut without an intellectual leg to stand on. (Here’s an article that outlines some of Barton’s gross distortions.) So I’m happy to condemn conservatives who are using their power to get him onto the air. However, I’m equally happy to condemn people who use my money to air progressive left views or middle-of-the-road views. I condemn anyone who takes my money without my consent and uses it to air anything, even if I agree with them.

The real problem with funding NPR and PBS and all the various public media isn’t the views that they air. Yes, I think the views represented on their shows tend to be solidly to the mainstream left, especially in the news programming. But even if they were absolutely even-handed — and even if they aired nothing but views I agreed with — the problem would be that government is funding a mechanism that influences our culture.

Taxpayer dollars are being used without the consent of the people they were taken from. And decisions are made about what to air by people who are indirectly employed or sponsored by government. Both of those are much more serious issues than the specific views being aired.

Even if you believe there was ever a justification for public broadcasting, that time is long past. There’s plenty of room in the free market for views of every kind. Let’s cut off funding for public media and let them decide how to survive on their own — with advertising or donations or whatever they want. There’s a market for much of what public radio does — and some of it is really excellent work. Let’s let it stand alone in the market and succeed or fail on its own merits.

Share on Social Networks

Here’s another reason to appreciate the cats in your life: New research involving 93 countries found that places with more cats per person also tended to have happier people. The researchers say the finding fits with previous evidence that living with pets can reduce loneliness and stress while providing companionship, emotional attachment and social support. The study doesn’t prove that cats cause greater happiness, but it certainly adds to the evidence that sharing your home — and your life — with a cat might be good for you.

The company that owns Facebook and Instagram is heavily promoting its new AI-based software assistant called Muse, but people who are using it as it was designed are incredibly foolish. An early adopter of the software discovered that a few days ago when he advertised an item for sale on Facebook Marketplace — and he inadvertently gave Muse full authority to act on his behalf. The software agreed to a lowball offer made by another Facebook user and then gave that man the home address of the man for whom he was an agent. The software told the buyer that the seller was home and waiting for him. When the buyer showed up and waited angrily, the would-be buyer left an angry review for the man. And this angry man had the seller’s home address. It was only well after that that the software reported what it had done and admitted it had made a mistake. I won’t be putting that much power into the hands of any software. I think anyone who agrees to such terms is a fool. And the software’s user agreement says you’re responsible for purchases the software makes in your name. Nope.

Meet my new girlfriend. Her name is Meg. And she’s my little sweetheart. A couple of months ago, a neighbor across the street told me about a new stray in the neighborhood that she and I were both soon feeding. The cat had been very skittish about contact and she had a lot of scabs and parasites in her fur, but a trip to the vet last week revealed that she was otherwise in good health. The vet estimates her to be 1 to 2 years old. I named her for Meg Murry, the 13-year-old protagonist of Madeleine L’Engle’s wonderful book, “A Wrinkle in Time.” (Please read the book. Don’t watch the horrible movie.) Since we lost Lucy almost a year ago, it seems appropriate that we finally have a new little girl to join the household. She’s already captured my heart, but Alex, Oliver and Sam aren’t there quite yet.

There’s nothing socially acceptable that’s as dangerous as drinking alcohol. Most people grow up being told to “drink responsibly” — and all of us see people abusing this drug in one way or another — but the truth is that drinking alcohol is always a terrible risk. The alcohol in these drinks is toxic and the human liver has to work hard to filter the toxins out. What most people don’t realize is that alcohol is classified as a known carcinogen by the World Health Organization — because of the well-established connection between imbibing and various cancers. Many people have taken refuge behind the idea that light or moderate drinking might be safe, but a new study shows that drinking even one drink a day increases the risks of 10 types of cancer. When I was a teen-ager, I looked around and saw the negative effects that this behavior had on a lot of people and decided not to start drinking, so I’ve never even tried this poison. The evidence keeps piling up that I was lucky to have come to that conclusion early.

It turns out that the radical far left has been training “Antifa cats” to sabotage anything important to Donald Trump. Everything he did was perfect. Honest. It was all the cats’ fault. Arrest all the cats! This is the latest of my ridiculous satirical shorts. Please go watch it. Then “like” it and subscribe. Please. I’m begging you. (Too much?) Although a couple of the previous videos have had views in the hundreds, most have still been seen by fewer than 20 people. So I seem to be having trouble letting people know that page exists.

Related Posts