• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

David McElroy

making sense of a dysfunctional culture

  • About
  • Podcasts

To enjoy ‘Atlas Shrugged Part II,’ you’ll have to grade it on a curve

By David McElroy · October 12, 2012

Lower your expectations.

Now lower them again. Then accept the idea that you can overlook some serious artistic mediocrity in some areas. If you’ll numb your judgement in these ways before going to see “Atlas Shrugged Part II,” there’s a chance you can enjoy it. Or at least parts of it.

Some books don’t make good movies. That’s what I said last year when I reviewed “Atlas Shrugged Part I,” and I feel that way even more strongly after watching “Part II” Friday afternoon.

If you’re a fan of the book — and you can see this movie as a paint-by-numbers adaptation of it — you’ll probably enjoy the movie. If you actually liked last year’s “Part I” (you know who you are), you’ll like this one just fine. But if you don’t already know and love the book, this movie will probably put you to sleep and make you curse whoever dragged you to the theatre to see it.

And that’s the bottom line. How much you enjoy this movie depends on the degree to which you’ll overlook its many flaws and grade it on a curve. It’s not a good film, but you can still enjoy parts of it if you lower expectations enough.

As a book, Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” is flawed, which should be apparent even to people (such as me) who love it. It’s not so much a novel as it’s a polemic. The characters don’t have depth. They’re simply two-dimensional representations of ideas that Rand moves around in order to make points. The good guys are completely good. The bad guys are completely evil. There are very few characters in the middle, and those few are portrayed as weak. There’s no character development.

This movie has the same flaws that the book has, but it adds to them. The actors are miscast and the direction seems questionable in many cases. The writers were boxed in by decisions made for “Part I,” but the dialogue wasn’t generally quite as heavy-handed as it was in the first part.

One of the worst decisions was to set the movie in the near future instead of the 1950s. A story that centers around railroads and steel mills just screams that it’s from another era. It would have worked much better as a story set in the past, even though the political and economic situation wouldn’t have fit actual history. This is another conundrum that makes it a tough book to turn into a movie.

The movie opens with absurd (but pretty) shots of Dagny piloting a jet that’s chasing another jet. The planes are so low and so dangerously close to Colorado mountains that you wonder if you’ve stepped into a reel of “Top Gun” or a James Bond movie.

From the beginning, everything about the actress playing Dagny is all wrong. Samantha Mathis probably isn’t a bad actress, but she doesn’t fit this role. She doesn’t have the screen presence to play Dagny, and she doesn’t have the kind of severe beauty that the book leads us to expect. She looks more like someone you’d find in a TV commercial for coffee or washing powders, playing the housewife who discovers a great new product. She’s not Dagny, and her presence detracts from every scene in which she appears.

Most of the other actors are just as poorly cast. As Hank Rearden, Jason Beghe has so little chemistry with Mathis that it seems laughable that these two are having an affair. There’s no spark. There’s nothing. It’s like an affair without the least hint of sensuality or desire. They come across more like random business partners, not as people who are hiding a torrid affair. And Beghe’s deep voice — which would be great if he were playing a gangster — feels all wrong to me.

In the first part, the evil government henchmen were played more like cartoon characters. That’s been toned down this time, thankfully, so they come across more believably. They’re not great actors, but at least they don’t feel as though they’re trying to play their roles as parody, as I sometimes felt in the first movie.

I’ve seen much better acting from actors in cheap indie films at festivals than we get from the leading actors in the movie, but the worst of the acting comes from those in supporting roles. Some of them don’t even seem like film actors. They seem more like folks you would expect to show up on stage at a halfway decent community theatre. On stage, that can work. On screen, it’s jarring and feels all wrong.

There’s a lot that I can criticize in the movie (and I’m leaving out a lot of things I noticed), but if you’ve managed to stay awake through the halfway point, you might very well find the last third (or so) of the movie somewhat entertaining. The parts dealing with the train wreck in the Taggart Tunnel are handled pretty well for a low-budget film. Showing the impending disaster from the vantage point of the Taggart operations center (which doesn’t exist in the book) helps the scene. And the train crash itself is pretty good considering the budget.

And this brings up an interesting contrast. The movie does a good job when it shows instead of tells. It does a lousy job when it’s mostly just people making speeches about principles. As much as I love the principles being discussed, they don’t make for good movie dialogue.

Here are a few other random odds and ends:

— Since the movie is set just slightly in the future, the pictures used to blackmail Rearden into signing the “gift certificate” are ludicrous. In the 1950s, he might have tried to protect Dagny from the shame of public knowledge of such an affair. For 2012 and beyond, it comes across as a story that wouldn’t be a blip on the public consciousness.

— A key point in the book before the train wreck in the Taggart Tunnel is that a steam engine has to be used to pull a train through the tunnel. In a movie based in the near future, it’s laughable to think that someone could even find a working steam engine nearby. Again, that story point made sense when set in the ’50s. It makes no sense for today.

— Why do protesters have signs (toward the end of the movie) attacking the government directive (10-289)? It would make sense to have the signs continue to protest against the greedy rich, but they make no sense that the signs are protesting the directive.

— Rearden Steel seems to like MacBooks, because we see them on Rearden’s desk and his secretary’s desk. Dagny also conducts a FaceTime call on her iPhone 4 (or 4S) toward the end of the movie. It’s noticeable that she’s holding the phone oddly in an effort to partly obscure the Apple logo so it won’t be a product placement shot.

— The set-up of Rearden’s trial scene is ridiculous. It’s not a courtroom, but an amphitheater with spectators watching about five judges directly confront Rearden. Nothing about the set-up is believable. When the spectators start cheering Rearden, it feels fake, because the kind of people who attend government hearings don’t suddenly start cheering billionaires when they make little speeches about the morality of self-interest.

— I hate it that we heard what is supposed to be the music of Richard Halley. The book builds the music up as being great, so nothing we hear could live up to the way it’s described. Especially in a low-budget production, the music isn’t going to be anything special. So knowing what his music is supposed to sound like makes hearing it sound anti-climactic.

Overall, if you liked the first movie because you like the book, you’re going to find this one acceptable. You’ll especially enjoy the last third or so. But if you don’t know the book or don’t have any real feelings about it already, you’re going to be bored if you’re someone who has much knowledge about what good filmmaking is.

The movie is opening on many more screens this weekend than “Part I” opened on, so there’s a chance that the opening weekend gross to be higher than the pathetic take of the first part. At my theater, though, I was one of only five people in the first screening of the day. There wasn’t a big rush for tickets to the first show.

If you go to see it, lower your expectations as low as you possibly can. That’s the only way I know to enjoy it. And if you don’t already agree with the political and economic positions of the book, don’t bother, because you won’t get the movie and it’ll just irritate you.

Just remember to grade it on a curve if you want to enjoy it. But please don’t drag your non-political friends, because they’re not going to get it and they’ll just be bored.

Note: As professional reviews become available, they’ll be posted at these pages at MetaCritic and Rotten Tomatoes. The first few reviews are strongly negative, but I think they’re (unfortunately) accurate and fair.

Share on Social Networks

Related Posts

  • Danger of Iran war getting stronger because of blindness, hypocrisy
  • My father’s death was proof that unhappiness quickly kills a man
  • She took an easy way to escape risk, but she’s left to deal with empty life

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

This was the view just after sunset Tuesday evenin This was the view just after sunset Tuesday evening near my house. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
At sunset Tuesday evening, the cloud cover over me At sunset Tuesday evening, the cloud cover over me was solidly gray and black, but one tiny break in the clouds appeared just for a few minutes to show a little bit of sunset’s colorful light. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I just remembered that I caught the sun just befor I just remembered that I caught the sun just before it slipped beneath the horizon Tuesday evening. This is near my house just east of Birmingham. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
This was another experiment with a moon photo — This was another experiment with a moon photo — with my iPhone — but I allowed the moon to be overexposed in order to get the clouds in the foreground to show up. I’d really like to figure out how pros do shots of this sort. I don’t have it even close to right. #nature #naturephotography #sky #clouds #moon #iphone14
This is the sunset I just watched right after dinn This is the sunset I just watched right after dinner. It was one of the most vibrantly colorful displays I’ve seen in weeks. It was really beautiful. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I don’t have the right lens to photograph the mo I don’t have the right lens to photograph the moon properly, but there are some nights when I try anyway. The longest lens I have goes to 240mm, which means I have to enlarge a tiny part of the frame way too much. But even if I had the right lens, I’m not sure I’ve figured out how to expose the moon decently while still showing some stars around it. Tonight’s attempt has given me a grainy moon and pinpricks of stars that become invisible when viewed at normal size. (Blow this up with your fingers in the app and you can see the tiny stars.) I really want to learn how to do this better, so if anyone has tips for me, I’d be happy to hear them. #nature #naturephotography #sky #moon
It’s been really hot in Birmingham today, so I’ve been thinking about how much I’m looking forward to fall. My iPhone must’ve been reading my mind, because it just showed this photo from November 2016 to me as a featured photo from my library. I remember this day well. It was in Trussville, which is just east of Birmingham. #nature #naturephotography #colorful #autumn #autumnleaves #birmingham #alabama
I just remembered this sunset photo that I took th I just remembered this sunset photo that I took this evening when I had stopped to get gasoline on I-20 just east of Birmingham. I was pumping gas when I suddenly realized the sky had erupted with bright pastel colors. I didn’t have time to get my “real” camera, so I just quickly shot two frames with my iPhone at the edge of the parking lot. It keeps surprising me just how good cameras on our smartphones have become. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
We had dark and stormy skies all day in Birmingham We had dark and stormy skies all day in Birmingham, but there was a little bit of light that was finally able to poke through the darkness right at sunset along U.S. 411 just east of Birmingham. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Critter Instagram

Lucy is doing her Neighborhood Watch duties about Lucy is doing her Neighborhood Watch duties about half a mile from home late Friday night. No matter how many times we do this, the sounds of the night always fascinate her. Watch the way her ears are constantly adjusting to pick up on something else. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Alex has been battling this little toy mouse for t Alex has been battling this little toy mouse for the last hour or so. A friend sent him several of these last December and he just discovered one of them tonight. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturdayeve
Now that his big brother is gone, Alex has decided Now that his big brother is gone, Alex has decided he has to be the alpha cat around the house, so he has his fiercest face on display. I don’t think anybody is going to want to mess with this powerful predator. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturdayeve
Alex seems to have regained his composure by late Alex seems to have regained his composure by late Thursday night. I don’t know what he might or might not feel about Thomas’s death, but his behavior seems to be returning to what is normal for him. He still wants to be very close to me, but that has always been a key feature of his personality. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
For “throwback Thursday,” I think it’s appro For “throwback Thursday,” I think it’s appropriate to go back to 2011 for the first photo I was ever able to get with Thomas. He was still living outside my house and I was feeding him on the porch. It took me quite awhile to get him to let me hold him long enough for this brief photo, but he clawed his way out of my arms very quickly. This was the very first photo that I used when I was still trying to find a home for him in October 2011 — before I took him inside to stay soon afterward. #tbt #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
I just got home for the evening and laid down on t I just got home for the evening and laid down on the bed, not realizing how quickly Alex would be lying on my chest purring. I think he’s happy that I’m home. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Alex still looks like a man who just lost his best Alex still looks like a man who just lost his best friend today, but he’s a lot closer to acting like his normal self than he was last night. I wish we could know how a cat or dog goes about processing the loss of a companion. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Alex has calmed down quite a bit. I hope tomorrow Alex has calmed down quite a bit. I hope tomorrow will seem more routine for him. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Alex still seems confused tonight, but he finally Alex still seems confused tonight, but he finally ate a little bit of food. I know that he’ll be back to his normal self pretty quickly, but it really does seem as though Thomas’s death this afternoon has left him perplexed. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)




Search

Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

On a live awards show Sunday night, one man made a joke about a female celebrity. The husband of the celebrity was offended and hit the man who made the joke. Or maybe it was staged for entertainment. Who knows? Who cares? Social media is full of discussion — and even arguments — about this idiocy today. This baffles me. Let’s assume for a moment that the event happened as reported. People have been having such idiotic fights ever since there have been humans. Half the bars in the world see such brief dustups regularly. It simply doesn’t matter. The fact that so many people believe they need to talk about this — or even need to have opinions about it — is more evidence of the bizarre media brainwashing that convinces many to care passionately about brain-dead trivia. Your life will be happier and saner if you focus on yourself, your family and your friends, not on whatever scripted (or spontaneous) bilge that the media wants to pipe into your home.

I’m in the middle of migrating this website to new servers this week. This means you might encounter some unexpected behavior until I get all the bugs worked out. Clicking on my links (including this one) might cause your browser to give you the message that it’s a site without a current security certificate. It’s not actually unsafe, but there’s something which isn’t yet set up for the security certificate. I apologize for any such errors you might encounter while the process is going on. If you notice any problems with content which didn’t migrate properly, I would appreciate you letting me know the details at davidmcelroy@mac.com. Thanks for your patience.

I often wonder what animals think when they look at us and consider the society we’ve created. Yes, I know this is fanciful and unrealistic, but what if they could? Would they be astounded at how we treat each other? Would they be disgusted by the ugliness and pettiness which fill so many of our daily interactions? The truth is that I’m feeling pretty disgusted with humanity tonight. I made the mistake of reading some online interactions that I should have avoided — and it sickened me. The people involved appeared to be vile and stupid and arrogant. I wish I could pretend they’re a tiny minority, but I know better. It’s times such as this when I most need to escape much of “civilization” and disconnect from their world. If humans are going to be worthy of “ruling this planet,” we have a lot of growth to do. And I fear that growth is nowhere in sight. So my buddy Thomas, above, and all of his friends would be right to judge us harshly — and to think, “Why do you folks get to be in charge?”

I should have expected this, but I honestly didn’t. The article I wrote last week about disagreements over treatment for autistic children brought me angry emails. You could almost call it “hate mail.” Of the five emails about it so far, two have been to tell me that I’m wrong to even listen to critics of the most popular therapy for autistic children — and the other three tell me I’m wrong for not condemning the treatment as the “obvious” abuse it is. If you read the article, you know I didn’t take a position on the issue, because I simply don’t know enough to have an opinion. But by talking about the issue, I stepped into a heated controversy. The emails from the two sides convinced me of nothing. But they did give me even more empathy for the unfortunate parents who have to figure out for themselves where the truth lies for their children.

Have you ever had what you thought was a new idea — and then discovered that “old you” had the same idea years ago? I had that experience tonight. And it’s been wonderful. I came up with an idea tonight for a very short satirical film that would be a promotion for a fictitious college. The point is to make the college promote — as good things — everything which is actually terrible about most modern colleges. Then I remembered a fake college that I invented back when I was in college. I had created student recruitment brochures and various newsletters back then, so I decided to call my “new” college by the same name I’d invented years ago: Ochita College. As I searched my computer for any old material I might still have about Ochita from the past, I discovered an email I sent to someone in 2009 — outlining essentially the same idea which I came up with tonight. Since I didn’t remember writing that, it felt like magic. So my next film project just might be this one instead. If all goes well, you might soon see “Ochita College: Your Future Starts Here.” This should be fun.

Read More

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this link. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and Lucy will thank you. And so will I.

© 2011–2023 · All Rights Reserved
Built by: 1955 DESIGN