• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

David McElroy

An Alien Sent to Observe the Human Race

  • About
  • Podcasts

Voting Rights Act oversight rules should reflect today, not the past

By David McElroy · June 26, 2013

Jim Crow is deadIf you listen to most of the mainstream media, you’ll believe that a decision Tuesday by the U.S. Supreme Court has just destroyed the voting rights of black Americans. MSNBC’s headline says, “Supreme Court guts landmark civil rights law.” Reuters headlined its story by saying, “Supreme Court guts key part of landmark Voting Rights Act.” Salon’s headline said, “SCOTUS guts Voting Rights Act.”

It’s almost as though some members of the media got together with black politicians and others on the progressive left to decide that “gut” was the most emotional verb possible to express their disapproval of the Supreme Court ruling.

If you don’t know much about the law or the history involved, you might think the court said it was now legal for states to discriminate against minorities and take away their right to vote.

Nothing of the sort happened. The spin against the ruling is dishonest. The truth is that the decision is a win for fairness. Let’s look at the reason why.

Let’s assume that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a proper remedy for the problems that existed when the law was passed. Up until then, blacks and other minorities had been seriously cheated for many decades by racist white governments in more than a dozen states, most of them in the South.

Those state and local governments had instituted rules to discourage or outright prevent blacks from registering to vote (or from actually voting). As a result, less than 20 percent of blacks were registered to vote, while somewhere around 65 or 70 percent of whites were registered. I don’t remember the specific numbers, but there was a very wide disparity — and it was by intentional design. Things such literacy tests and poll taxes were used because the elites who held power knew it would stop blacks from voting.

What went on was wrong. I don’t favor civil rights legislation to force private businesses to treat everyone the same way (or even to serve everyone), but any instance of governments treating people (or groups of people) in different ways is wrong. Government has no rational basis for discriminating against people based on race and various other categories.

The Voting Rights Act declared that governments had to treat groups of people the same way. The key enforcement mechanism was something called “pre-clearance,” which required state and local governments in 15 states to get approval of the U.S. Justice Department or a federal judge before they made any changes to anything related to elections. (Some states were covered much more than others. A few were covered only for certain counties, for instance.)

If you had a city council with five members and you wanted to change that to seven members, you had to have the federal government’s permission to make that change. If you wanted to change voting locations or polling hours or district lines, you had to have approval. Anything that was vaguely related to an election required approval from Washington.

Why were those 15 states (or parts of states) singled out? It was based on a formula that looked at discrimination in place for 1964. As the law has been renewed over the years, it has continued to be based on that same determination of what discrimination was like in 1964. So if your state, city or county had a pattern of discrimination prior to 1965, you were required to continue getting federal approval for any change you made — even if there was no evidence that your state, city or county was guilty of any kind of discrimination for decades since then.

Those who opposed ending the use of the 1965 pre-clearance rules say that it will somehow destroy minority voting rights. They frequently cite efforts to enact voter ID laws as examples of renewed discrimination. This has always confused me, because I’ve never been able to find anyone who can tell me how this is discriminatory against blacks or other minorities. If you want your money out of a bank, you need ID. If you want a driver’s license or passport or pretty much anything else in the world, you need an ID.

Why is it so onerous to insist that people be able to show they’re who they claim they are? It’s not especially difficult to get it. In most places, you just go to the office that issues driver’s licenses and get one made there. (Here’s how it’s handled in Alabama, for instance.) It’s especially galling to me since I’ve talked to people who were paid to go from one polling location to another to vote in different names in different places — which they can do since identification isn’t required.

U.S. Supreme Court-frontA county just south of Birmingham sued over the law, saying that there was no rational basis for the county to be held responsible today for practices that were in place almost 50 years ago. In a 5-4 split ruling, the Supreme Court agreed that there was no rational basis to continue applying data from 1964 to governments today with no record of discrimination.

That’s all this ruling does. It says that pre-clearance can still be required, but there has to be a rational current basis for requiring that. If a state or county can be shown to be discriminating recently, pre-clearance rules are rational, the court ruled. But it’s not fair or reasonable to hold governments responsible today for what was done by racist politicians five decades ago or more.

The court said Congress is perfectly free to enact new rules based on a current determination of who is discriminating. So Congress still has that power — as long as it’s done fairly.

This ruling won’t prevent blacks from having the right to vote. It won’t prevent Congress from having the power to stop racial discrimination in voting. All it does is require the rules to be fair and rational. It requires that Congress enact rules that treat states, cities and counties equally — based on current reality.

It’s hard for me to see how a rational person could disagree with that — unless he thinks that people today are responsible for what other people did 50 years or more ago.

Share on Social Networks

Related Posts

  • Very few things warm my heart and fill me with joy like babies
  • If parents excuse cheating, what should we expect from their kids?
  • If you’re waiting to be rescued, what are you still waiting for?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

Tonight’s sunset was very soft and delicate, lik Tonight’s sunset was very soft and delicate, like something from a painting with pastels. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I am endlessly fascinated by the beauty of bare tr I am endlessly fascinated by the beauty of bare tree branches against a night sky, but my photos of such scenes never seem to quite match the loveliness of what I see in person. #nature #naturephotography #tree #night #sky #birmingham #alabama
I stopped at the Cahaba River bridge on I-459 just I stopped at the Cahaba River bridge on I-459 just south of Birmingham to catch this sunset shot on the way home from work Tuesday evening. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
Just after I left the office Friday afternoon, I s Just after I left the office Friday afternoon, I saw this beautiful sunset and had to stop to record it. I accidentally shot it with too high an ISO, so it’s far more grainy than it should have been. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I love the way the moon looks through the bare bra I love the way the moon looks through the bare branches of a tree in my front yard tonight. On a cold night such as this one, it can sometimes seem as though the winter will never end and spring will never arrive. #nature #naturephotography #sky #night #tree #moon #birmingham #alabama
Ever since a neighbor strung some decorative light Ever since a neighbor strung some decorative lights in his back yard a year or so ago, I’ve been trying to figure out how to photograph them. In person, the effect is stunning on the yard, but I’ve struggled to figure out any sort of perspective that would be interesting. I’m still not entirely happy with this, but it’s th best I’ve been able to come up with so far. #lights #backyard #birmingham #alabama
It’s 27 degrees in Birmingham after midnight, bu It’s 27 degrees in Birmingham after midnight, but the thick fog covering my neighborhood right now makes it feel magical enough to ignore the miserable cold for a few minutes. #nature #naturephotography #fog #trees #night #birmingham #alabama
As I was getting into the car after work just afte As I was getting into the car after work just after 5 p.m., I looked up and saw this beautiful full moon shining through the bare limbs of a nearby tree. #nature #naturephotography #tree #moon #birmingham #alabama
Here are the top nine photos I’ve posted on this Here are the top nine photos I’ve posted on this account in 2020, as determined by your “likes.” #topnine
Follow on Instagram

Critter Instagram

Merlin wants to know if someone has come to bring Merlin wants to know if someone has come to bring his dinner very early — and if not, why not? #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturday
Molly keeps a silent vigil over the office in the Molly keeps a silent vigil over the office in the wee hours of Saturday morning while the other cats are already asleep. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #greeneyes #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturday
After a nice midnight walk — in perfect 66-degre After a nice midnight walk — in perfect 66-degree weather — Lucy wants to stay on the porch to sniff the night air and listen to dogs barking in the distance. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Merlin is the unquestioned ruler of the animal wor Merlin is the unquestioned ruler of the animal world in my house. He doesn’t push his weight around, but he clearly knows he’s royalty — and the others treat him with due respect. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
For “throwback Thursday,” here’s Bessie from For “throwback Thursday,” here’s Bessie from almost six years ago. Molly and her twin sister were only about 8 years old in June 2015, but she looked more like a kitten here. #cats #tbt
Molly contemplates life late Monday night as she r Molly contemplates life late Monday night as she relaxes on her warming pad in the office. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #greeneyes #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
You might have noticed that Thomas always insists You might have noticed that Thomas always insists on wearing his white vest for photos. He’s very proper. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
I’m having dinner at a restaurant and just check I’m having dinner at a restaurant and just checked on the cats via CritterCam, which showed Thomas, left, and Merlin cuddled up as they slept. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Merlin is enjoying the warm Saturday afternoon sun Merlin is enjoying the warm Saturday afternoon sunshine in an office window. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturday
Follow on Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)




Search

Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

Tyler Barnes will never be a basketball star. He probably peaked as a star high school player in Louisville, Ky. But for the last four years, he’s been a walk-on player for the University of Alabama. He’s a chemical engineering major with lots of academic honors who rides the bench because he loves being part of a team. He sometimes gets into games with a minute or two to go, but only if Alabama has a big lead. This Saturday, it was senior day for Alabama basketball, so it was his last chance to play in Coleman Coliseum. Alabama Coach Nate Oats says that one of the team starter’s came to him an hour before the game started — and fellow senior Alex Reese asked Oats if Barnes could start in his place for this one game. Even though the game was huge for Alabama, which is ranked No. 6 in the country and trying to wrap up an SEC title, Oats agreed. Barnes started and played the first three minutes, grabbing what was only the fourth rebound of his career and missing his only shot. Barnes has a great future as an engineer, but you’ll never again hear from him as a basketball player. For three shining minutes Saturday, though, he was a starter for a top-10 college basketball team — and his parents were in the stands from Kentucky to see it. There’s a lot of ugliness in college basketball right now, but this story makes me happy.

It was five years ago tonight when Lucy first rode in the car with me. She was on her way to her “forever home” with me that night, but she didn’t know it, so she was terrified. It was a much happier and braver girl who took a ride in the car tonight so we could go through a drive-through window and order a hamburger for her — to celebrate five years with me. She had a great time. If she could remember five years ago tonight, she would be proud of how far she’s come, too. If you’d like to know more about Lucy’s journey from scared dog to brave queen of the household, here’s something I wrote after her first year with me. I’m hoping this girl will have many more happy years with me.

I’ve never been attracted to skinny women. There’s nothing wrong with someone who’s naturally thin, but it’s never been my preference. What has shocked me, though, is the judgment I’ve heard from women all through my life — about themselves and others — about who’s “fat.” I concluded long ago that most women in our culture have been brainwashed to believe that skinny is attractive — and that anything other than skinny is ugly. I first assumed that I was the oddball — for preferring women with bigger and heavier bodies — but I’m coming to the conclusion that most men naturally feel this way to one extent or another. I just ran across new research by a couple of Northwestern University psychology professors that shows that women seriously overestimate how much a straight man will be attracted to a skinny woman. In a perfect world, we would all be at a healthy weight, but when it comes to attractiveness, too heavy is more attractive than skinny. At least to me — and to a lot of men, too.

Years ago, I heard a question that seemed very insightful at the time. You’ve probably heard it, too. What would you do if you knew you couldn’t fail? The question is intended to help you uncover things you really want to do, but which you’re afraid to try — for fear of failure. In an interview today, I heard the great marketing guru Seth Godin give a different point of view. He said the better question is to ask what you would do even if you knew it would fail. That struck me as far more insightful than the original version. We ought to be doing what we know is right, not what will maximize our success or praise from others. There are some battles that are worth fighting even if you believe you’re doomed to failure. Those battles are often for love or important ideas or our children. Some things are simply worth fighting for — and the truth is that you might win anyway. Do the right thing. Take the chance.

The more I understand about myself, about human nature and about the nature of reality, the more I realize I’m a radical by the standards of both Modernism and Postmodernism. Seeing the things which I’m stumbling toward makes me an enemy of many of the core ideas upon which contemporary culture is built. It exposes the culture as a monstrous lie — like a dangerous infection that’s slowly destroying what human were created to be. My “inner observer” has always known that truth was found in the ideas of the Enlightenment, but I’m slowly finding words to explain what has merely been instinct until now. The Enlightenment was humanity’s great leap forward, but shallow and arrogant thinkers for the next two centuries threw away the fruits of that achievement. We can’t go forward as a species until we go back to correct this intellectual and spiritual error — and part of that is acknowledging that our collective attempts to do away with our Creator will always fail.

Read More

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this ad. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and I thank you. (If you’re using an ad-blocker and can’t see the ad, you can click here instead.)

© 2011–2021 · All Rights Reserved
Built by: 1955 DESIGN