Death of a parent pushes buttons, even for badly broken families

By David McElroy · February 7, 2018

I watched the white-haired man walk slowly into the bank. He used a cane to steady himself. He moved slowly. He looked very frail.

I knew the face, but I didn’t really know that face anymore. I had known this man when he was young and strong and vibrant, not when he seemed more like the men from my grandparents’ generation.

But though I hadn’t seen him for years — and though he had changed a lot — this man was still my father.

Until today, I hadn’t seen anyone in my family for roughly eight years. Although I never would have called us this when I was a child, the truth is that we were a seriously dysfunctional family. We didn’t know that phrase then — and even if we had known it, we would have been in denial.

My mother left us when I was young, so I barely knew her as I grew up. I tried to have a relationship with her after I became an adult, but she was nothing more than a vivacious, child-like stranger — despite the fact she desperately wanted a relationship with me. (To her credit, she apologized for the effect her leaving had on us. She explained why she left as well as she could.)

I haven’t seen my mother in more than 20 years. In my mind, she might as well be dead, maybe because I’ve come to terms with what she was and the things she did. I haven’t seen either of my sisters for close to a decade, although I occasionally exchange email with one of them.

But my father has always been the emotional center through which I had seen my family, for both good and bad. I’ve been estranged from him for about eight years, for reasons that I won’t explore deeply here. He would say it was my choice, but I made that choice only after he declined joint counseling to deal with the long-standing issues between us.

My father now says he will die soon, but I don’t know the details.

“My life is in imminent danger now — not sometime in the future,” he wrote in an email over the weekend. “I live alone and no one would know immediately if I died. In my billfold I have you listed as the person to contact.”

Even though I have no contact or interaction with my father anymore, there are still things that must be done when he dies — and it appears I will be the one to do those things.

He’s given me information about who needs to be contacted and what assets will need to be disposed of. We met at a bank in Birmingham today to sign some necessary documents.

This isn’t the end that any of my family would have predicted many years ago. It’s not something any of us would have wanted. But this is reality for a group of hurting people who’ve stumbled through their adult years trying to figure out the right things to do — and being confused by the actions of those they would have once counted on for love and support.

Thursday will be the 16th anniversary of the death of a woman I used to know quite well. When I first met her about 14 years ago, the effect of her father’s death was still painfully strong for her. I remember one night as I was getting to know her when she talked about him for hours — and she sent me dozens of pictures and articles about his death. It was very clear to me how strongly his death had affected her. That made enough of an impression on me that I’ve remembered the date of his death each year since then.

Thinking about the anniversary of his death — combined with seeing my father today — has left me wondering which is the worse way to lose a father.

Is it better for the man to remain alive — like a ghost who still exists somewhere in the world, even though you have nothing to do with him? Is it worse for someone you love to be suddenly yanked from your life, leaving you feeling as though you can’t count on the stability of the world around you?

Is there a good way to lose a parent?

I doubt it, even though every single one of us deals with in in time, assuming we outlive them. No matter how it happens — through an unexpected accident or through hurtful estrangement — it pushes emotional buttons that leave us changed.

On the inside, I’m still the same person I was as the crying 2-year-old you see above. The same things that hurt us as children have followed us as adults, even though we have trouble seeing that — and most people just bury the feelings and never look at them.

When we were children, we counted on our parents — people we saw in almost god-like ways — to make the world right for us. Every generation has to grow up and come to grips with the fact that their parents were mortals who had no more idea how to make it through the world than they do.

We think we can count on the blood relationships of our family of origin. As children, we assume those will always be our closest relationships. For some people, maybe that’s even true.

But for many of us, we have to create the family we wanted instead. We have to find people who can maturely love us — people we can trust, people we can count on — and we have to work hard at building the emotional stability and understanding that we assumed was automatically ours when we were children.

Family is something we build, not something we’re simply born into. The people we love are those we choose to love — when they choose to love us.

Losing a parent means losing a big part of the innocence and trust we start with in life. Whether it happens unexpectedly in an accident or slowly through estrangement, it hurts to lose someone you thought was the center of your life. Nothing can change that — and few people can understand how it changes you.

When I left my father at his car today — maybe for the last time I’ll ever see him — he said, “I love you,” with a feeble voice. I just wanted to ask why he wouldn’t go to counseling with me to deal with our issues when he was offered a chance multiple times.

But I didn’t say that, because nothing can change what happened now and there’s no reason to argue about it. So I just just walked away. I’ve lost something — very slowly and very painfully.

Now the only thing I can do is find a way to build the family I wish I had — and that’s the most difficult task in any human life.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts