Maybe we’re doomed to replay past until we finally get it right

By David McElroy · February 13, 2018

My friend asked the question out of the blue. I was spending the night with my friend, Larry, and I was lying on a twin bed in the corner of his room.

“What do you think about your mom being gone?” he asked.

It didn’t strike me as a difficult or important question, but something about the experience has burned everything about it into my memory. I was about 10 or 11 years old. Although my mother had been away from us off and on for years, the divorce had been final only for a year or two. She had no custody or official visitation.

I considered Larry’s question for a long moment. I felt very cold. Very hard. There was no emotion in my voice.

“I couldn’t care less if she moved to the Sahara Desert,” I said.

That’s all I said and Larry didn’t ask any more. It’s a good thing, because I might have cried if he had pushed to know what I meant. I was confused. I couldn’t tell if I felt nothing or if I felt more than I could handle. I swept the feelings under a rug in my heart — and I left them there.

I’ve talked before about losing my mother — to manic-depression and to abandonment — when I was young. She first tried to leave my father when I was about 5 and my sisters were about 3 and 1. The first couple of times she left, she took us with her. Eventually, she concluded she couldn’t leave and take us, too, so she left us behind.

She was in and out of our lives — living with us for weeks or maybe months, but then gone for more weeks or months — and we never knew what to expect. I was relieved when they divorced, because I thought I might at least have some stability. I was mistaken.

I thought I adjusted to her absence very nicely. In fact, I thought we were better off without her. After she tried to get one of my sisters to come live with her — when I was about 15 or so — I called her on the phone and told her very curtly to leave us alone.

“You’ve done enough damage already,” I told her. “You’re not going to take away the family I have left.”

It wasn’t until I was in college that I started trying to process the confused feelings about her that I had left buried. And it was many more years until I realized the degree to which I was affected by losing her. But slowly, even I couldn’t miss the obvious effect that her loss had had on my romantic relationships with women.

It took me a long time to piece this together — and I had the help of a good psychologist — but I eventually realized that losing her made me fear that any woman I loved would abandon me.

Because I didn’t have another woman to take her place when I was young, I came to unconsciously associate love with a painful longing for someone I couldn’t have.

A psychologist told me about 10 years ago that I almost certainly wouldn’t have had the same experience if I had been able to transfer my need and my desire for a mother figure to someone else at a fairly young age. But because there was no one else, I learned an unhealthy pattern connected with love — one of pain and fear and loss and longing.

In a couple of key romantic relationships — only the most important ones — I have tried to replay that old script. When I first discussed this issue with the psychologist, I was afraid this meant I didn’t really understand how to love in a healthy way, but the therapist said that wasn’t the issue.

“Oh, you love her very deeply,” she told me of the first woman with whom this happened. “It’s real love. You’re not wanting her to be your mother. But there’s something in you that thinks if you can win her back, it will finally be like winning the love of your mother.”

I was stunned to realize she was right.

I’ve come to understand that I have very clear instincts about who to love, but I don’t know when to let go of someone who’s not going to give me what I need. On some unconscious level, I’m running an old script. I’m feeling the painful longing for a love which I can’t have — and I think that if I can just get this one woman to love me, that ghost from the past will finally die.

I will finally be able to feel that I’m worthy of love.

It’s hard for many of us to consciously understand how strongly we’re affected by some of the losses we suffer. Especially when it comes to a relationship as key as the one with our opposite-sex parent, our romantic relationships are almost certain to show a powerful effect. Even though I know that today — on a conscious level — the pull of painful longing is more than I know how to deal with. Even though I know I’m playing out one of the oldest emotional scripts of my life, I keep playing the part — and hoping that I’ll find love instead of confusing rejection.

The very fact that I do this says pretty powerfully that the old wound hasn’t healed. What’s more, I know from experience and from study that we tend to be attracted to people who are just as wounded as we are. Could I unconsciously be choosing to fall in love with someone who will reject me — to play out the hurt that feels so familiar? Maybe.

While we all think we’re making rational decisions about what we want and about what’s good for the people we love, we’re acting in ways that are consistent with our fears — about abandonment, about loss, about fear, about pain.

I feel as though there’s a part of me that’s hiding from the world — just as I was hiding in that picture above when I was a little boy. If you think about it, I was hiding but I was sticking my head out and making myself visible to my mother in a way that said, “Please find me.”

I wanted for love to find me. I needed for love to find me. I needed for love to say, “I love you so much that nothing can take me away from you.”

As an adult several decades later, I’m still doing the same thing. I’m still longing to be chosen — to be found, to be adored, to be loved.

It seems as though I’m going to keep on replaying this old and painful story — either until someone loves me and choses to stay or else I run out of time in life and it’s too late.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts