A month after my father’s death, it doesn’t feel real that he’s gone

By David McElroy · May 17, 2018

At dinner Thursday night, I saw a man walking into the restaurant who looked a lot like my father. I had the same reaction I’ve had for the last eight years. Every time I saw someone who looked like him, I thought he had found me and was coming to confront me.

It took me a couple of moments to remember that it couldn’t be my father this time — because my father was dead and cremated.

I suspect it’s going to take a long time for me to accept that he’s dead and that he can’t show up at some unexpected moment to scold me or tell me I’ve done something wrong.

Over the last year or so, my father showed up at my house multiple times — despite me making it very clear I wouldn’t talk with him except with a counselor. I had a serious concern that he would show up at my office and make a scene.

He had no understanding of boundaries — and even less respect for other people’s clearly stated boundaries. He ignored other people’s wishes if they conflicted with his own. He genuinely didn’t seem to understand that he didn’t have a right to exert control over people — and he especially felt he had the right to try to control his children.

When I first moved away from living with him, it took me years to relax in my own home. I can remember sitting on my own sofa with my feet propped up on my own coffee table — something which would have brought an angry condemnation from him — and feeling the irrational fear that he was going to see me through a window and scream at me. This sort of fear was common for years.

One of my sisters recently suggested that all three of his children suffer from a form of post-traumatic stress disorder. I had never considered that, but the more I think about it, the more it seems probable. I have emotional triggers that other people can’t understand. I can get lost in my fears when one of those buttons is pushed — and then I feel a corresponding anger rising before I realize what’s going on.

A month hasn’t been enough for me to completely realize that I’m free of his trying to force himself on me, but how long is it going to take me to feel free of that old fear?

His death has also left me thinking even more about my own mortality. I expect to live for many more decades, but the death of parents seems to have this effect on many people.

I know we all have to die — and I accept that — but I’m nowhere close to being ready for death, because I haven’t done so much of what I had intended to do years ago. I haven’t achieved things that matter to me and I don’t have the family that I want so much.

There’s so much that lies ahead of me.

I have another reason that death is on my mind tonight. Or maybe it’s more appropriate to say that I’m thinking about how lucky I am to be alive — and about how I need to take advantage of this life.

I read a couple of days ago about the death of a woman who worked in the real estate industry here in Birmingham. I had met her but I didn’t know her well enough to even wonder what happened to her. But as I was walking in to the restaurant for dinner tonight, someone called to tell me what he had heard.

She was about 35 years old and she had to have her gall bladder taken out — exactly the same surgery I had in early January. The surgery seemed to go fine and she went home. Then she developed a fever and she felt awful.

The woman went back to the hospital, where it was determined she was suffering from sepsis. The infection had spread rapidly enough that her organs were shutting down. Doctors were able to get everything working again except her liver — and that killed her.

It’s a sobering story to me because it makes it clear to me how close I came to dying in January.

Hours after the surgery was over, the surgeon told me that my gall bladder turned out to be so diseased that it would have broken open and caused sepsis if I hadn’t had the surgery quickly. As a result, my surgery took three hours instead of the planned 30 minutes. He said I was very lucky that it hadn’t already ruptured, because that would have caused sepsis. He told me I very likely would have died.

It’s scary to me to think I came that close to possible death.

I feel saddened that my father’s death meant as little as it did. There were a few people who were certainly concerned about him, mostly those around whom he had been living for the past few years — those who knew nothing of his lies and dysfunctional past until he went into the hospital and the truth slowly started coming out.

Since his death, I’ve had his old MacBook Air and I’ve kept checking his various email accounts periodically. I thought I would eventually run across some friend who had been concerned and had written to check on him. Despite the fact that he’s been offline for two months — with no warning — not one single person has written to say, “Are you OK?”

My father’s death seems to have mattered little — but only because of the way he had lived his life.

I don’t intend to be like him. I want my death to matter to some people who love me — and I want to earn their concern and care by the way I live my life with them.

I can see my father’s life in a lot of different ways. I know I don’t yet have enough perspective about it, but just one month down the road, his death mostly seems like a cautionary tale — reminding me vividly to live my life in a way that I won’t end up alone and unloved.

His death teaches me a terrifying lesson. I don’t want to die alone.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts