Loving father’s pride in daughter easily bridges our language gap

By David McElroy · June 6, 2018

When I pulled into my driveway this evening, I had to be careful to avoid getting in the way of a softball. The man next door was outside with his daughter again. The little girl is around 8 or 9 years old and he was throwing balls high into the air for her to practice catching fly balls.

“Great catch!” I called to her as she got to a difficult ball just in time. Then I asked her dad — jokingly — if she’s going to be a softball star.

“She already is,” he said as he beamed with pride. “She plays on the community team and they’ve been winning tournaments. They won in Tuscaloosa next weekend. If they win one more, they go to the state tournament.”

I don’t know this family well, but we always wave and say hello. They’re originally from somewhere in Latin America and the parents’ accented English is sometimes difficult for me to understand.

This evening, though, I didn’t have any trouble understanding. He was a loving father whose pride in his little girl was unmistakable. His love for his daughter transcended our language gap.

I constantly see this man spending time with that little girl. The mother is there, too, and she spends a lot of time with the girl, but there’s something noteworthy about this father’s dedication. Maybe it’s just that I see so many fathers who only grudgingly spend time with their daughters instead.

For a lot of fathers, children are a source of ego-satisfaction and little more. Those fathers love being the one who their children are eager to see when they’ve been away. This sort of father doesn’t really want to spend a lot of time with the child, patiently teaching and nurturing. That sort just wants to bask in the warm glow of being wanted.

If you see scenes from a relationship between such a father and daughter, you might even think you’re witnessing something healthy. The needy child is eager to see the father who has been so emotionally absent — and the father is happy in that moment to be wanted and needed. That sort of man wants those moments of joyful adoration, but he’s not interested in taking care of the simple everyday needs of his children. (Or his wife, for that matter.)

That’s not love. That’s a narcissist looking for what’s called “narcissistic supply.”

What I see from my neighbors is different. I never see him scream at his daughter. I never see him telling her she’s no good or that she’s doing everything wrong. I just see him patiently showing her how to do things right.

I’ve watched them having batting practice in the back yard. Whether she’s hitting the ball or she’s missing everything, he’s smiling and teaching her how to do better, but in a way that makes her relaxed and happy.

I’ve watched her help him wash their cars. He shows her how it’s done and picks her up when she can’t reach a spot on her own. She doesn’t do a great job — she’s a child, after all — and he simply fixes what she didn’t do well enough. And the time they spend doing it seems happy, not like work.

I’ve watched him teach her what he’s doing as he assembled an above-ground swimming pool for her. She seemed to want to know how it all worked. He didn’t brush her questions aside. He patiently explained — and made it fun for her.

I’m envious of what he has with that little girl.

I know that good father-child relationships are common — maybe not as common as they should be, but still pretty routine. It’s just that he has something I don’t have. He has something which I want very much.

There are few things in this world which are as exciting and potentially world-changing as raising emotionally healthy children. Almost anybody can produce offspring, but far fewer are emotionally mature enough to manage their own needs and wants and demons well enough to give their children the start they need in life.

I’ve always known I wanted children, but for many years I was afraid to have kids, because I was afraid I would be too much like my narcissistic father. Both of my parents came from dysfunctional families. I was determined not to continue their unhealthy psychological patterns.

I finally know I’m emotionally healthy enough to give children what they need — and I’m eager to have that sort of relationship. I always know that intellectually, but there are certain times — and certain relationships — that bring it home to me emotionally.

They’re next door right now living normal life as a loving family. They have no way of knowing how much I want the simple and loving relationship which seems to come so easily for them.

He’s a good father. She’s a good daughter. They’re lucky to have one another.

Share on Social Networks

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

For four years, Donald Trump’s supporters screamed that everything that went wrong was the fault of Joe Biden. They were sometimes right and they were sometimes delusional. (Anybody who knows me understands that I can’t stand Biden any more than I can stand Trump, just for different reasons.) But for two months, Trump has rampaged through U.S. political life — vandalizing pretty much everything in sight — and the vast majority of his supporters are silent at best. Many watch as he blows up the world economy and they make excuses for him. They’re in absolute denial, even about things that Trump is doing very intentionally. Anybody who understands economics and history knows that tariffs are a terrible idea from a pragmatic point of view. Anybody who values individual freedom knows that tariffs are massive taxes on individuals — and they’re a tool of political control over the ability of people to trade freely. Trump is the antithesis of everything which political conservatives stood for just a few years ago. It’s far past time for people who claim to be conservatives to reclaim the principles and values which they used to claim — and stop this mad man before he can accelerate the day when we experience economic and social collapse. Open your eyes to reality and reject this lying narcissist.

Related Posts