How can we be lonely while we’re surrounded by billions of people?

By David McElroy · July 17, 2018

Marleen Brooks found a note waiting for her when she got to her home in Park Hills, Mo., one evening last year. She had never heard of Wanda Mills, but her heart broke when she read the handwritten plea.

“Would you consider to become my friend,” said the note from Mills. “I’m 90 years old — live alone and all my friends have passed away. I am so lonesome and scared. Please — I pray for some one.”

Brooks is a 37-year-old property manager and she had no idea this woman even existed, but the address was for a house across the street from her and just a couple of doors down. She didn’t know anyone even lived there.

The next day, Brooks and a friend took cupcakes and went to visit Mills. (See the photo below.) The friends spent about an hour with the older woman. They found out Mills had lived in the house for 51 years. Her husband was dead. Most of her remaining family was either dead or lived far away.

Living in the middle of a busy neighborhood, Mills was invisible — and lonely.

That was a year ago. Since then, Brooks started a Facebook group called Pen Pals for Seniors. (Here’s a Facebook link.) Close to a thousand letters have been written through the program for older folks who need someone to give them attention.

As for Mills, she moved to a nursing home last fall. Brooks still visits regularly, along with her husband and sons. Shortly after her move to the nursing home, Mills spoke to a Washington Post reporter about the change she has seen in the culture around her.

“Neighbors don’t neighbor like people used to,” Mills said. “Neighbors used to visit each other. But they don’t do that there. I don’t guess they do anywhere.”

I’ve thought a lot about this issue of modern loneliness. It’s a problem for a lot of folks, not just older people living alone. Structural changes in the modern world have changed everything about the way we interact with neighbors.

For most of human history, we lived around family and friends for life. But changes in the economy and in transportation have changed all of that. Most of us end up living a lot of different places — living among almost nobody we knew as we grew up.

Neighborhoods are more transient. Even in neighborhoods of homeowners, people come and go all the time. In neighborhoods with a lot of renters, things are even more temporary. Most people don’t really know each other.

My neighborhood is a mixed bag. I have a wonderful retired school teacher who lives across the street from me. When a tree fell on my fence a few weeks ago, her son volunteered to cut it for me. They’re great people.

There’s a nice young family on one side of me. Right now, there’s a vacant rental on the other side. (Until recently, there was a friendly young doctor and his nurse wife who lived there with their baby.)

But beyond that immediate area, I don’t know most of the people. I wave to a few others when I see them, but I wouldn’t know them if I saw them in person in a restaurant. We’re effectively strangers.

I don’t know what the answer is, because these structural changes to our culture are relatively new. The problem, though, is that I’m not sure many people even realize there’s a problem to be solved.

My observations suggest we have a real crisis of loneliness. I’ve heard other people talk about the same thing. But I don’t see anybody doing anything to change things.

Maybe a solution will involve restructuring neighborhoods. Maybe we need more of the sort of social organizations that could take the place of neighborhood churches which filled that role for so long in this country. (I don’t think neighborhood churches are coming back, unfortunately.)

There are a lot of people like Wanda Mills out there, but very few of them are going to write us notes asking for us to be their friends. Many of them are younger, too. There are lonely men and women who live in homes where they don’t really know each other. There are single people who live alone and wish they had people to spend time with. There are even people who spend time with others all the time — but who feel alienated because nobody really knows them.

The modern world can be a lonely place. Many millions of people all around us need to connect with us — and we need to connect with them. We just have no idea how to reach out to those rare people who can make us feel loved and understood and known.

Someone needs you — and you need that someone. Making that connection might be the biggest problem facing busy and struggling modern people who know that something is missing for them.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts