Who are you trying to impress? Answer may explain who you are

By David McElroy · June 27, 2019

This seems to be reunion season. College and high school classes all over the place are getting together to reminisce about old times and to nervously eye each other — with many thinking, “I don’t look that bad yet, do I?”

I know at least half a dozen people who’ve been to reunions in the last month. For some, it’s just fun, but for others it’s a time of sober reflection. When I talked with one friend today, he told me his reaction to seeing his classmates from not that long ago.

“Being there has me thinking about some things,” he said. “I looked around that night and realized these were the people who I grew up wanting to impress — and when I look at them now, I can’t figure out why I ever cared what they thought of me.”

When you were a small child, you wanted to impress your parents, maybe your siblings, maybe extended family and family friends. As you got older, the circle of people you wanted to impress changed. You wanted to impress your peers. Then you wanted to impress romantic interests. Your audience kept changing.

But at every point in your life, your choice about who to impress has said very loudly who you are.

When I was growing up, I wanted to impress my father — and others in my family to a lesser degree. By the time I was in high school, I wanted to impress those in my school and in my church — my teen-aged peers and the adult leaders.

I needed their approval. I can’t tell you why. I just know that humans are social creatures who need the approval of those around us.

I wanted those people to believe I was smart and capable. I wanted them to believe I was a leader who was going to do great things. I wanted them to believe I was a good and moral person.

By virtue of caring what these people thought of me, I unconsciously adopted many of their standards. In order to please the people who you want to impress, you have to understand what they believe is good and acceptable. Either consciously or unconsciously, you begin to mirror their values.

I mirrored the values of my very conservative community. It was never a choice. It was simply a given that the values of my family and church and school and community would be my values. Whether intentionally or otherwise, you almost certainly did the same. Sometimes this works well. Other times, it doesn’t.

Shared values are good for community cohesiveness, but what happens when the community values are wrong or when those values lead an individual to do things which aren’t in his or her best interests?

What happens when the community values say that racism is perfectly moral and natural? What happens when the community values teach everyone that one particular religious group is evil or should be persecuted? What happens when the community values tell individuals to repress themselves — not to be who they really are — in the name of being what the community wants?

I wouldn’t have understood these questions when I was a teen. I doubt you would have, either. We just accepted the community values we received — rebelling a bit around the edges, for sure — but we essentially fell in line with whatever group we decided we wanted to like us.

Fortunately for me, I moved away from those people and I questioned my values. Even back then, I was enough of an outsider and an iconoclast to question things more than the group typically preferred. And by the time I had been away for 10 years or so, I started radically going off on my own — discarding many of the values of my youth community and replacing them with values I chose for myself.

Not everybody learns to think for himself in such ways. Some people are unfortunate enough to have stayed pretty much exactly what they were when they were growing up. And they almost never change.

For those of us who reject where we started, it’s easy to think that we’re just independent people who aren’t influenced by others anymore. But even that is mistaken.

Although my core values are pretty solidly in place, I still reflect some of the values of those very few people who I want to impress. But now, that’s a much different group — sometimes just one person, in fact — and I’ve come to the conclusion that’s OK.

When you love other people, those are the people who go a long way toward determining who you are. If you choose wisely, those people help you to walk a path that you will be proud of. If you choose people who aren’t worth partnering with, their values will corrupt you and lead you down a painful path.

The person who will affect your values and life choices more than anyone else is the partner you choose to love. Whether you intend it or not, that person will ultimately shape you and your values. He or she will shape your children and their values, too, no matter how much you fight it.

Remember this: When you dance with the devil, the devil changes you.

When you were a child, you didn’t have any choice but to want to impress your parents and win their approval. When you were a teen, it would have been almost impossible to have no concern about wanting to win the approval and praise of your peers and community.

But if you’re a mature adult, you are now responsible for your choices.

Ask yourself who your actions are trying to impress. Ask yourself whose approval you really want. If you’ll ask those questions — and be brutally honest with yourself — you’ll learn a lot about your values and about who you really are.

If you don’t like those answers, you can make changes. No matter where you are in life, it’s not too late to decide whose approval you want. But decide carefully. That choice is going to shape your destiny — and your children’s destiny — whether you like it or not.

Choose wisely whose approval and love to seek.

Share on Social Networks

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

For four years, Donald Trump’s supporters screamed that everything that went wrong was the fault of Joe Biden. They were sometimes right and they were sometimes delusional. (Anybody who knows me understands that I can’t stand Biden any more than I can stand Trump, just for different reasons.) But for two months, Trump has rampaged through U.S. political life — vandalizing pretty much everything in sight — and the vast majority of his supporters are silent at best. Many watch as he blows up the world economy and they make excuses for him. They’re in absolute denial, even about things that Trump is doing very intentionally. Anybody who understands economics and history knows that tariffs are a terrible idea from a pragmatic point of view. Anybody who values individual freedom knows that tariffs are massive taxes on individuals — and they’re a tool of political control over the ability of people to trade freely. Trump is the antithesis of everything which political conservatives stood for just a few years ago. It’s far past time for people who claim to be conservatives to reclaim the principles and values which they used to claim — and stop this mad man before he can accelerate the day when we experience economic and social collapse. Open your eyes to reality and reject this lying narcissist.

Related Posts