Search for new partner leaves me wondering where she’s waiting

By David McElroy · November 28, 2019

Somewhere in this world, there is a woman who wonders tonight where I am. There’s a woman who wants me and needs me and is willing to choose to be my wife. Somewhere tonight, there is this woman who I will want and need just as much as she wants and needs me.

I’m certain of that.

I no longer know her name. I no longer know what she looks like. She presumably doesn’t know I exist and I don’t know she exists. But I know she’s out there — and I know she’s looking for me.

It’s been almost six years since I’ve actively searched for a partner. I’ve gone out with some women over the past few years, but it was halfhearted. I don’t recall going out with any of them for a second time, except for the one who pursued me enough that we dated for an unhappy four months.

This week has been the first time in nearly six years that I’ve resumed an active search for someone new. The only thing I can be sure of is that the woman I met for dinner Wednesday evening wasn’t the right one.

I met and dated a number of women who I met online in the past, so I thought I’d give it another shot. I placed a very detailed profile on a very large service. I explained in excruciating detail who I am and what I know about who I’m looking for.

I emphasized that I’m socially conservative and that I’m looking for a partner for the long term, but most of the responses seem to have ignored the words and just responded to someone who lived fairly close and posted a photo of himself.

One woman sent a photo of herself topless. After she said just a couple of things that show that she had read some of what I wrote, she ended it with, “Want to titty f*** me?”

Another said she had been attracted to the fact that I was looking for something serious and that I sounded as though I had morals. She told me she had grown up in church and wanted to “get back to church.” But when I read her profile, it was all about drunken debauchery and teasing winks about what she’s looking to do with men.

Only one woman even seemed worth responding to. Since she lives near where I work, we agreed to meet Wednesday evening for dinner.

There was nothing interesting about her in person. She kept looking at her phone. She answered my questions with short answers that told me nothing. She wasn’t interested in asking me much of anything about myself. She was attractive enough and bright enough — a grad student at a local university — but I’ve had better chemistry with random check-out clerks at grocery stores.

I just got through the meal and politely walked her back to her car. I knew I’d never see her again, but I figured I could wait until later to say that. As we got to her car, she turned and got close. She put a hand on me somewhere inappropriate.

“So do you want to go someplace and f*** me?” she asked.

What is it with the language of the women I’ve run into so far? And why is it so hard for them to understand that I’m looking for a real relationship, not just a stranger to have sex with? It was almost comical.

I really thought that if I was very, very clear about what I was looking for, I could avoid this sort of game. But I appear to have been mistaken.

I know the right woman is somewhere out there waiting for me. It can’t possibly be that I have met the only women in the world who I might fall in love with and who might fall in love with me. It just can’t be.

When I was young, I believed that God had somebody special for me — and for everybody. I believed there was one woman who would be my right partner. Over the years, I slowly changed my mind and developed the rational notion that we are allowed to randomly find partners and that we just make our own best guesses about who to choose. (And that’s why so many of the choices are wrong.)

About five and a half years ago, something oddly coincidental happened to cause a woman to contact me out of the blue who I had been crazy about in the past. The coincidence led to us talking a lot and then falling in love. The coincidence felt so crazy that I started believing — again — that God must be guiding this.

After that relationship failed — for reasons that will probably never be clear to me — I’m back to the “needle in a haystack” theory. I don’t know where my needle is. I don’t even know which haystack to search.

I’m not an easy person to match. I’m not typical. I don’t quite fit in modern culture. I’m a throwback to something more traditional. And the woman I’m looking for isn’t typical, either. She’s like me in the sense that she can move through the modern world and interact however she needs to, but she’s not really one of the typical members of the brain-dead, sleepwalking culture in which we live.

How do two such people find each other? I really don’t know.

I’m not happy with having to look again, but I have no choice. I’ve wasted five years when I could have been looking instead of waiting for a phone call that was never going to come.

I know she’s out there.

I know she’s someone who will love me and want me and need me. I know she’s someone I will want and need and love, too. I know she’s someone who will enthusiastically choose me as her partner.

I know she’s waiting — just as impatiently as I am — but I don’t know where she is.

Share on Social Networks

Is it an attempt to blur the gender line between men and women? Or is it some weird tribute to the traditional Scottish kilt? It’s hard to say, but fashion designers keep pushing for men to wear skirts in the last few years. Both men and women in modern fashion seem oddly androgynous, as though it would be offensive for a man to look manly or for a woman to look feminine. A CNN article about the latest fashions from Paris caught my attention Monday and left me wondering about the ugly clothes the designers are hawking. If a man wants to wear a skirt — or a kilt — that’s OK with me, but I’ll stick with a traditional dark suit with a white shirt and tie. (Well, when I’m not wearing t-shirts and sweats, of course.) I always wonder who actually buys the outlandish garb from fashion designers anyway. I would be humiliated to be seen in any of this stuff, but I obviously have no sense of high fashion.

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

Related Posts