Today’s group hatred says world hasn’t learned Auschwitz lessons

By David McElroy · January 26, 2020

Monday marks the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camp at Auschwitz. I’m not sure the world has yet learned the lessons of the horrors discovered there.

The Soviet Red Army reached Auschwitz first on its way through Poland. That was on Jan. 27, 1945. U.S. and British forces coming from the west found and liberated similar camps in the weeks to come.

In each place, the story was the same. There was evidence and testimony of an efficient killing machine. Those still alive were used as forced labor. Those who became unable to work were killed. Mass numbers of people were also executed as part of Hitler’s “final solution” for ridding his world of Jews. The survivors were emaciated and dying.

I frequently come across people online who claim that the killing that went on in these camps — of Jews, gypsies, gay people, mentally ill and other “undesirables” — either didn’t happen or else has been exaggerated.

Every time I hear such claims, I want to show these people the photos that I printed from very old negatives when I worked at a University of Alabama photo lab while I was in college.

The lab where I worked provided all sorts of photographic services for academic divisions of the university. Some days, I took photos, but most days, I worked in one of half a dozen of our darkrooms, printing black-and-white photos, either passports or prints from negatives with some sort of historic value.

One day, the head of the lab came to me and told me he had a difficult job he needed me to handle. Somebody in the university had been able to get old black-and-white negatives of photos that were taken by U.S. Army photographers when one of the concentration camps was liberated. And he needed me to print photos from all of those fragile old negatives.

The photos were very graphic. What you see online can’t compare to the horrors that I saw in those old images. There were mangled piles of emaciated bodies, including graphic images of torn body parts. There were close-ups of the equipment used to murder people with gas. There were pictures of dying survivors.

The fragile old negatives had to be handled carefully, so every print was done by hand. That means that I looked at each image — first as a negative to evaluate, then as a light being projected onto photographic paper, and then finally as an image coming to life in a tray of chemicals.

In order to do my job correctly, I had to pay attention to sickening details and handle their printing with cold technical precision. It took at least a week of work for me to process everything — and that was a very somber week for me.

I was living in freedom and prosperity as I looked at these images of what humans can do to other humans when they learn to hate — and then when they obey orders to murder men, women and children in cold blood.

The anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation has me thinking about these photos, but I’m also thinking about them because I feel the world heading into a very dark place in political and social terms.

For reasons which I’m not going to try to cover here — some of which I’ve covered before — I am very pessimistic about the future of our society. Things are making less and less sense for anybody who’s paying attention, and I fear it’s getting worse.

Most people don’t seem to notice this, but even if they do, they have only a vague sense that their political enemies are the cause of the looming problems. Few people seem to see it as a systemic problem which is likely to bring us back around to this same sort of ugliness which we swore wouldn’t happen again.

I don’t know what to do about it. I don’t know how to make the world make enough sense that it‘s not painful to live in human society — and that’s depressing to me.

We’re seeing an increase in all sorts of group hatred today. Antisemitism is on the rise. Racial tensions are rising, with whites, blacks and Hispanics as allies and enemies in different situations. Those who call themselves conservatives hate the people they call liberals, even though they have absolutely no understanding of what those hated people really want. Those on the left have a growing hatred of white people who don’t share their socialist leanings. And they have special hatred for southern white men.

There are lots of other divisions. Ethnic. Religious. Geographical. It’s not just disagreement. It’s hatred.

In secretly recorded audio, a key aide to Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders talks of being a communist and wanting to kill rich people and send conservatives to “re-education camps.” The private words of those of other groups would reveal similarly dark desires to dehumanize and destroy their opponents, too.

The murders of millions in Nazi concentration camps came because Hitler and people who followed him had to find someone to blame for everything they saw wrong in the world. People today are doing the same things. They don’t yet have the power to go as far as things went in the Third Reich, but give them time.

The real lessons of those concentration camps is that hatreds of this sort — based on group identity — ultimately lead to very dark places. We don’t have concentration camps or anything similar yet, but the people of Germany didn’t believe any such thing was coming when Hitler rose to power in 1933, either.

We have to find ways to live in peace with those we don’t agree with. We have to quit trying to use force to make other people obey our desires for how they should behave and what they must do with their lives and property.

If the hatred we see today keeps growing, some form of Auschwitz will be right around the corner again.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts