Hurt people attract others who know what it’s like to feel hurt

By David McElroy · September 12, 2020

It was nearly 12 years ago. I had come back to see a psychologist with whom I’d been in therapy before. I had just ended a romantic relationship in a very confusing way — and I needed to understand why.

I laid out the facts for the psychologist about what had just happened. I explained my confusion. Why had I ended the relationship — but then wanted her back after she finally gave up and walked away from me? Was I crazy or what?

She listened for most of that hour and then gave me a little bit of feedback and asked a few follow-up questions. At one point, she said — as though it was the most obvious thing in the world — that this woman with whom I’d been in love had come from a dysfunctional and troubled past, but hadn’t dealt with it.

I didn’t think I’d said anything that would lead to that conclusion, so I expressed surprise.

“Oh, I don’t know what her issue is yet,” she said, “but she wouldn’t have been attracted to you — and you couldn’t have been attracted to her — if she didn’t have issues just as serious as yours. People are attracted to others who are about as emotionally healthy as they are, whether they know it or not.”

This was a shock to me at the time, but it seems obvious now that I’ve spent more than a decade thinking about it.

Even though we’re often oblivious to the emotional damage that we’ve sustained — or maybe even in complete denial — something in us unconsciously recognizes someone who understands something similar.

I’ve found that a woman who doesn’t have some kind of dysfunction or emotional issues in her past (or present) isn’t going to understand me. What’s more, a woman who doesn’t have some sort of issues doesn’t seem interesting to me. Even if her issues are hidden — and she thinks nobody knows where to find them, maybe even herself — something in me feels something familiar in her.

I’ll be honest. A woman who has had a perfect life and has a perfect family and has no emotional issues bores me to death. It doesn’t matter how attractive she is. Is doesn’t matter how smart or interesting she is. I’m not interested if there’s not “something wrong with her,” either now or in the past.

That’s what the psychologist meant. It seemed obvious to her on the day she explained it to me. After thinking about it for all this time, it seems obvious to me, too.

I’m thinking about this tonight because of some psychology videos I watched on YouTube today about narcissism. I’m not sure what led me to them. I was down last night and woke up depressed today. I was feeling frustrated — once again — with some things about myself which I attribute to having been raised by a narcissist.

As I watched a few videos about a specific type of narcissism — covert narcissism, which I suspect was my father’s type — I listened to an Australian psychologist describe what it was like for the children of a narcissist.

Without knowing quite why, I felt a knot in my stomach. My entire gut tensed up. I knew all this applied to me and it made me feel physically ill. And in my feeling of emotional panic, I knew who I needed to share this with — and that left me thinking about why I felt that way.

I wasn’t looking for anyone to solve anything. I wasn’t needing someone to fix anything about me. I just needed for someone to listen to what I felt — and then to love me anyway.

The woman I instinctively needed to share this with wasn’t really good at dealing with this sort of thing. Honestly, she was scared to talk about it. She said she didn’t understand the reasons entirely, but I think the entire subject poked at something inside her that she preferred not to examine. As long as she tried to avoid my feelings, she could avoid her own — about something undefined — at the same time.

But that made me want her more. It pointed to where her emotional land mines were buried. Even if she was scared of looking at them, I knew the time would come. I didn’t know the details about her hurt, but I knew it was there — and I knew that we shared more emotional pain than she could admit.

There was a time — when I was more foolish and certainly had less emotional understanding — when psychological or emotional issues in a woman were enough to scare me away. It turned out that this had been what I’d done with the woman almost 12 years ago. She had some serious hidden issues — which later came out in scary ways after we split — that made me want to run.

I know better now.

I understand that I will always live with the damage that was done to me in my distant past. It doesn’t have to mess up my life today. I can live a normal life. But it’s not something to deny. It’s not something to be ashamed of. It’s just part of what made me who I am.

And I also understand that any woman I fall in love with is going to have some sort of emotional issues — either past or present — whether she’s dealt with them or not. If she hasn’t been through that, I’m not going to be attracted to her — and nothing about me will ever attract her.

We seem to go through some unconscious matching with someone who’s about as emotionally healthy — or has the potential to be — as we are. We probably don’t understand that. But we might as well accept it.

For those of us who know we have emotional baggage to deal with — or that we’ll never be able to entirely leave behind — it’s actually safer and healthier to match up with someone who can “get it” when it comes to our issues or past issues.

Here’s what I understand now. If you fall in love with someone who has scary issues, just hang on tightly when things get scary. As long as both people are willing to work on things to be emotionally healthier — individually and together — you can completely trust that person. The only danger is if you’re with someone who’s in denial — and refuses to deal with whatever he or she feels.

I sometimes look at couples who both come from reasonably healthy families and who don’t ever have to deal with any of this — and I feel some envy. But then I realize that’s silly. If I hadn’t gone through the things that hurt me, I wouldn’t be who I am today — and I like the person I’ve become.

If my future wife hadn’t gone through her own problems, she wouldn’t want me. I wouldn’t want her. I ought to be grateful for what I’ve gone through, because that dysfunctional experience is a lot of what will make me right for this woman.

I’m not sure exactly what’s led me to this ruminating this weekend. It’s uncomfortable. It’s lonely. It still feels messy at times, even after all these years.

But I’m grateful to understand that whoever is right for me will one day be able to be there for me — and will allow me to be there for her. The truth is that she and I will need each other.

In truth, we’ve always needed one another — even on days such as today, when I don’t know how to find her.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts