{"id":18111,"date":"2013-05-21T00:00:47","date_gmt":"2013-05-21T05:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidmcelroy.org\/?p=18111"},"modified":"2013-05-20T19:49:28","modified_gmt":"2013-05-21T00:49:28","slug":"city-rushes-to-demolish-4-5-million-transit-station-after-only-13-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/?p=18111","title":{"rendered":"City rushes to demolish $4.5 million transit station after only 13 years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.davidmcelroy.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/MAX-station-Birmingham.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-18112\" alt=\"MAX station-Birmingham\" src=\"http:\/\/www.davidmcelroy.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/MAX-station-Birmingham.jpg\" width=\"458\" height=\"403\" srcset=\"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/MAX-station-Birmingham.jpg 458w, https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/MAX-station-Birmingham-300x263.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 458px) 100vw, 458px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Why would someone tear down a $4.5 million building that&#8217;s only 13 years old? If you&#8217;re a government agency, you do it because you simply want to build something else. After all, you&#8217;re not spending your own money.<\/p>\n<p>In Birmingham, the local mass transit agency built a fancy new central terminal for buses in 1999. It&#8217;s across the street from the Amtrak station, and the Greyhound bus station is a few blocks away, in a location where it&#8217;s been for many decades. When the new terminal, shown above, was built, it was supposed to be the first phase of a larger project that would combine a terminal for Amtrak, Greyhound and local transit buses. The agency has been talking about an &#8220;intermodal facility&#8221; for years.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority is a county-wide, inter-government agency, but it&#8217;s the Birmingham city government that drives the bus, so to speak. Mass transit is important to a substantial number of people who live in the inner city, but it&#8217;s irrelevant to almost everybody who lives in the suburbs. (I&#8217;ve never been on one of the buses and I see many of those big buses riding around the area virtually empty.)<\/p>\n<p>So why is this very expensive new building being torn down this summer? That&#8217;s not clear. Nobody seems to ask hard questions &#8212; and make them stick &#8212; when it&#8217;s &#8220;government money&#8221; involved.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Most of the money to build the current facility came from the federal government. I haven&#8217;t been able to find the breakdown of who paid how much, but the <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.al.com\/sweethome\/2012\/06\/future_cloudy_for_birmingham_i.html\" target=\"_blank\">local newspaper said the entire building cost $4.5 million<\/a>. Since the city is now tearing it down, the Federal Transportation Administration wanted to city to reimburse it for a portion of the cost of the building and the market value of the land.<\/p>\n<p>Initially, it appeared that the city could be liable for up to $8 million in penalties to the FTA, which makes me wonder if the building really cost more than the reported $4.5 million, but I&#8217;m using the lower figure to be conservative. But the <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.al.com\/spotnews\/2013\/05\/federal_penalty_land_swap_clea.html\" target=\"_blank\">city and the FTA have agreed to a deal<\/a> that will see the city turning some land over to the FTA and paying a penalty of $101,000.<\/p>\n<p>With that, you&#8217;d think the federal government would understand that the idiots making decisions for the facility aren&#8217;t to be trusted with such decisions &#8212; and large amounts of money &#8212; but the FTA is now going to turn around and give the city even more money to build the <em>new<\/em> bus terminal to replace the <em>old<\/em> terminal that it also paid for.<\/p>\n<p>Does this sound insane yet?<\/p>\n<p>The new bus and train station will cost nearly $30 million. The FTA is giving the city $23.6 million of that and city voters have approved borrowing $6 million to go toward it.<\/p>\n<p>So why <em>is<\/em> the city tearing down this nice, almost-new building and constructing another one? It&#8217;s certainly not because ridership is so heavy the building can&#8217;t handle the traffic. The current building was designed as the first phase of a larger project that would become an intermodal facility, so it&#8217;s not that the needs have changed. What could it be?<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.al.com\/sweethome\/2012\/06\/future_cloudy_for_birmingham_i.html\" target=\"_blank\">only explanation I can find<\/a> comes from an article in the local newspaper last summer:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The design team of Giattina Aycock Architecture Studio and Hoskins Architecture, both of Birmingham, and Niles Bolton of Atlanta worked nearly a year on options for the site. In the end, the concept required leveling the [Metro Area Express] bus station, even though the $4.5 million structure was built in 1999.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s not an explanation. That&#8217;s just an unsupported assertion that the architects decided it was best.<\/p>\n<p>If there were a real explanation, it would have surfaced by now. Various local politicians have expressed doubts about the plan and about the wisdom of tearing down a perfectly good building, but no explanations have been forthcoming except vague comments about the architects deciding it was best.<\/p>\n<p>I wasn&#8217;t there, so I can&#8217;t tell you the real reason. Not for sure. But I&#8217;ve been around politics long enough to figure that it was probably something like this. Somebody important to the project &#8212; maybe the major or maybe someone else with clout &#8212; looked at the architects&#8217; options and loved a grandiose proposal that the architects had thrown out there as the unrealistic dream plan. And whoever that was said something like this.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This one looks impressive,&#8221; said my theoretical important person. &#8220;I like this one way better than the others. It will impress people. I don&#8217;t care if it costs three times as much. I want something that looks cool. After all, we&#8217;re not spending our own money.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>At that point, everybody would have chuckled and realized he was right. As long as the &#8220;important people&#8221; say the money should be spent, the people whose money is being stolen have no say in the matter. That would be you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Why would someone tear down a $4.5 million building that&#8217;s only 13 years old? If you&#8217;re a government agency, you do it because you simply want to build something else. After all, you&#8217;re not spending your own money. In Birmingham, the local mass transit agency built a fancy new central terminal for buses in 1999. <a href=\"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/?p=18111\" class=\"more-link\">Keep Reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-uncategorized","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1x9iR-4I7","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18111"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18128,"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18111\/revisions\/18128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidmcelroy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}