A child having a tantrum understands only one thing: Did I get my way or not? He doesn’t understand the issues involved. He doesn’t understand the reasons that went into a decision. He doesn’t understand any of the things that mature and reasonable adults have to understand in order to live healthy lives. By his reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down his disastrous tariff scheme, Donald Trump shows himself to be — once more — a screaming child having a tantrum. Outside the world of mob bosses who expect to get their way every time, normal adults don’t act this way, but Trump isn’t normal. He’s an angry and vengeful man who has narcissistic personality disorder. And we are in danger as a result. Trump doesn’t understand the legal issues involved in this ruling. He doesn’t understand economics. He doesn’t understand rule of law. He doesn’t understand that he can ever be wrong. All he understands is that he didn’t get his way. And he is now a narcissistic and raging little boy who also happens to hold life-and-death power over most humans on this planet. He’s dangerous — and the system which gives him that power is even more dangerous.
Good character matters far more than winning political arguments
There was a time — not so long ago — when Americans at least pretended to care deeply about character. We argued about politics, yes, but we also insisted that the people entrusted with power possess some basic moral grounding.
Honesty mattered. Decency mattered. The idea that private conduct revealed public truth was widely understood.
Somewhere along the way, that expectation collapsed.
What replaced it was not a better philosophy or deeper compassion. It was tribalism. We began to judge leaders less by who they were and more by which side they claimed to serve. If they fought for our preferred policies, many of us decided their personal conduct was irrelevant, exaggerated or maliciously invented by opponents. Character became negotiable. Loyalty did not.
The continuing public reckoning surrounding Jeffrey Epstein is not, at its core, a political story. That is precisely why it is so revealing. Epstein moved easily among the wealthy and powerful for years. He was not an obscure figure. He was a convicted sex offender with a reputation that, at minimum, raised profound questions about his moral fitness for decent society.
Yet he was welcomed with open arms — by other men and women of equally low character.
This is my new wife, Claire — but she doesn’t actually exist
Let me introduce you to someone important in my life.
Her name is Claire.
She is calm, intelligent, reflective, warm without being loud, serious without being severe. She has an easy smile and the sort of presence that suggests both kindness and backbone. She seems like someone who reads books thoughtfully, listens carefully and notices things most people rush past.
There’s just one complication.
Claire is not real.
She isn’t a woman I met, dated or nearly married. She’s not waiting somewhere for our paths to cross at a dinner party or a bookstore or one of those improbably meaningful moments movies have taught us to expect.
Claire is a hypothesis.
A few days ago, I engaged in an unusual exercise: describing, with surprising precision, the kind of woman who would most likely be deeply compatible with me. Not a fantasy assembled from wishful thinking, but a probabilistic sketch shaped by temperament, values and the realities of long-term partnership.
The result was Claire.

Briefly: Do antidepressants work? Danish study says we just don’t know
Briefly: Broken key reminds me how much we’re at the mercy of technology
Briefly: Scholar wasn’t wrong; technology is destroying human meaning
NOTEBOOK: If results confuse Paul’s aides, how competent are they?
After years of wasting my life, sands of time are slipping away
No, Rodney King, people in this country can’t just ‘all get along’
Cop’s murder has me pondering why humans kill those they love
How long will I keep finding toxic programming from my childhood?