What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

Obama’s plan to ‘tax the rich’ is simply class warfare — and politics
Cat’s ordeal reminds me that bad things happen right under my nose
I’m looking at myself in mirror and asking difficult questions
If abortion is just simple choice, why is killing babies for gender bad?
At times, we have to just wait for the day when we’ll see the fruit
Best way to fight terror? Turn off your TV and get back to real life
What’s the best word for those of us who just want to be left alone?
Shock of seeing ‘Airplane!’ was realizing that I wasn’t all alone