For most of my life, I had generally avoided novels written before I was born. They were stodgy. The language was outdated. They were boring. Even if they were significant in the historical sense, I saw them as the literary equivalent of reading the King James Version of the Bible.
I was wrong, of course, but I didn’t realize that until the last decade or so. I first started reading English translations of some Russian classics. I came to love Leo Tolstoy’s “Anna Karenina” and Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov,” among others.
Then a friend introduced me to German novelist Hermann Hesse. To one extent or another, I found that I loved “Steppenwolf,” “Siddhartha,” “Narcissus and Goldmund” and “The Glass Bead Game.” I’ve read “Narcissus and Goldmund” four times so far — and I keep finding new things to appreciate about it.
But I was slow to appreciate the English writer Charles Dickens — and I’ve come to understand that this has meant depriving myself of a kind of literary joy that I haven’t experienced for a long time. I just finished the Dickens novel, “David Copperfield,” a few hours ago — and I’d like to suggest that this book is better than almost any fiction that’s been written since I was born.
I’m left feeling serious regret that I’ve had such a huge hole in my education about literature and human existence.

Life is like flying a plane as you assemble it from a box of parts
Anonymous attacker hit me hard, but I can’t let coward change me
Defense mechanism led me to repress unacceptable emotions
Is it persistence or stubbornness to keep chasing uncertain outcomes?
We live in Reverse World, where black is white and good is evil
Will I run for office? The short answer is ‘no’; the longer answer is ‘no way’
Door in my dream keeps trying to take me to the life I’ve needed
Texas judge beating his daughter exposes truth behind coercive state
Blind faith in our ability to reason led to arrogance, false certainty