Different people want different things. We accept that in most areas of life, so why can’t we accept that the same thing is true for how the places we live are managed?
I like steak, pizza and chicken. I don’t care for seafood, Chinese food or most veggies. (Don’t mention that last part to my doctor.) I would be rather unhappy in a world where the majority voted to adopt seafood and Chinese for all the restaurants. I would be happy if none of the restaurants served what I don’t like, but many other people wouldn’t be. Fortunately, it’s not an either/or situation. I have the places I like. They have the places they like. We can change our minds and move back and forth between restaurants.
So if this competitive model is good for restaurants — and cars and computers and pretty much everything the free market provides — why do most people tend to favor “one true way” for governing territory?
We’re all a little crazy; I worry about those who don’t know it
500 years after Luther’s 95 theses, there’s still not much to celebrate
What can a free society do before an unstable person commits a crime?
On National Dog Day, remember how love can change any of us
How miserable does someone have to be to ‘troll’ a cute dog picture?
Three years after she sneaked in, World’s Happiest Dog® is queen
Root problem for dysfunctional culture goes deeper than politics
Reaction to Penn State scandal shows danger of putting leaders on pedestal
How much can human heart take when inner winter lasts forever?