For most of my life, I had generally avoided novels written before I was born. They were stodgy. The language was outdated. They were boring. Even if they were significant in the historical sense, I saw them as the literary equivalent of reading the King James Version of the Bible.
I was wrong, of course, but I didn’t realize that until the last decade or so. I first started reading English translations of some Russian classics. I came to love Leo Tolstoy’s “Anna Karenina” and Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov,” among others.
Then a friend introduced me to German novelist Hermann Hesse. To one extent or another, I found that I loved “Steppenwolf,” “Siddhartha,” “Narcissus and Goldmund” and “The Glass Bead Game.” I’ve read “Narcissus and Goldmund” four times so far — and I keep finding new things to appreciate about it.
But I was slow to appreciate the English writer Charles Dickens — and I’ve come to understand that this has meant depriving myself of a kind of literary joy that I haven’t experienced for a long time. I just finished the Dickens novel, “David Copperfield,” a few hours ago — and I’d like to suggest that this book is better than almost any fiction that’s been written since I was born.
I’m left feeling serious regret that I’ve had such a huge hole in my education about literature and human existence.

Being alone allows us to indulge our worst flaws and avoid change
No matter how ‘defeated’ you are, there’s a way to transform yourself
ABC execs’ desire to delay interview shows misunderstanding of their job
Why Santorum is wrong: When God sees sinful world, that includes U.S.
Very few things warm my heart and fill me with joy like babies
Most prizes feel empty, because our real need is for connection
At times, we have to just wait for the day when we’ll see the fruit
Cycles of our lives sometimes bring us back to places where we’ve been
Head and heart don’t agree about love, including Valentine’s Day