Does everyone have a “true love,” even if we all love other people at different times during our lives? My rational side says it’s a silly concept from ridiculous movies, but my heart absolutely believes it’s true. I couldn’t rationally justify it, of course, and I wouldn’t try. I just know that something in me believes. To my heart, it feels as though I’m one half of something which was broken apart before we were ever born — and something out there whispers from far away, “You still need me.” And tonight, more than ever, I feel the empty place next to me which only my true love can fill. It’s flattering to be wanted by others from time to time, but they can be only pale substitutes — at best — for one who ought to be there. My brain knows my heart is irrational about this, but truth isn’t always rational
On National Dog Day, remember how love can change any of us
In January of 2016, a neighbor asked me to help her find a home for a “special needs dog.” The dog’s name was Lucy.
She lived in an apartment with a couple who had several other dogs and a couple of cats. They had rescued Lucy from life on a chain as a puppy, but they said she had always remained timid with people and terrified of the world. They were moving and wanted to find somewhere else for her to live.
Her eyes had the dull and unhappy look you see on the left. That’s the first photo I ever took of her.
I was told that adopting Lucy would be like taking on a special-needs child. I was told not to expect her to ever change.
Today, I call her the World’s Happiest Dog®. She loves everybody. She’s always happy. And I think it’s because she feels loved and secure.
Today is National Dog Day and I think it’s a good time to remember how much difference we can make in the lives of these special animals — and how much difference their love can make for us.
Briefly: Villain of ‘Fahrenheit 451’ is public hooked on pop culture, not censorship
I can’t say this often enough. Books are banned in Ray Bradbury’s novel, “Fahrenheit 451,” but government censorship isn’t the point of the book. (Bradbury himself said so himself.) Censorship is merely a plot device to talk about what newer media are doing to the desire to read and understand literature. It was television when he wrote the book, but Bradbury would say the same things about the Internet today. It’s about people not being wanting the burden of having to think — and of them turning to mindless junk instead of anything worthwhile. It’s about people’s individual choices, not about the dangers of banning books. Bradbury said clearly that the culprit is the people, not the government. Clarisse McClellan’s family were used in the book to contrast thinkers from the rest of society. They weren’t out there fighting censorship. No, they were merely iconoclasts who had the good sense to talk and think about things that mattered, as opposed to almost everybody else — those who were entranced by the White Clown and his television friends. This book is more relevant than ever before, especially as social media consumes us and changes society for the worse. Please read the book. You might need it just as badly as I needed it when I first read it years ago.

Briefly: Do antidepressants work? Danish study says we just don’t know
Brief: Trump’s tariffs cost Americans $19 billion in 2018
Briefly: As much as I love football, latest evidence convinces me it’s harmful
We’re neither friends nor enemies, just strangers who share the past
‘This path leads to somewhere I think I can finally say, I’m home’
When love finally dies, it’s like a fever breaks and the pain is gone
Briefly: Lucy’s been meeting little girls in her neighborhood tonight
Briefly: Irrational moments of joy or pain can reveal hidden truths
Briefly: People remember how you treat them — and they can pay you back