Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

How many of these Christmas myths did you assume were from the Bible?
Epiphany: My message changed when I selected a new audience
‘Curing’ unpopular beliefs through psychiatry is throwback to ugly past
A president can be dictator if he claims it’s for national security
I’m writing a book — and I’ll be talking about it as it progresses
I’m painfully blind when I ignore the inheritance I’ve been given
Angry and bitter people often misunderstand one another
Moral priorities: ‘If we free the slaves, who will pick the cotton?’
A ‘faux father’ loves being adored, but a real father is there full-time