If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

AUDIO: Now is a time to take risk, not the time to be stopped by fear
Boston ‘gay on gay’ assault shines light on absurdity of ‘hate crime’
‘Black vs. white’ thinking causes confusion without shades of gray
Trip to Memory Lane reminds me some relationships deserve to die
This is why people are confused about what anarchists really are
Illusions we project for others allow us to remain hidden inside
Trust and spontaneous order don’t require heavy hand of the state
My best advice: Choose the person you don’t want to live without
As nightmares plague my friends, I’m grateful mine have subsided