You might not know Matthew Lesko‘s name, but there’s a good chance you’ve seen or heard one of his ads. He claims to have been researching government grants for more than two decades and he claims to be the expert on “free money for everybody.”
I’ve always found his ads offensive, because there’s something horribly distasteful to me in the idea of “free money.” There’s no such thing as free money. There’s only money that’s been taken from one group of people and given to another group of people — and that’s always seemed very wrong to me.
But I’ve been thinking lately about this issue, and I’m not sure the case is as simple as I’d like it to be. It’s not that I’ve suddenly started approving of governments coercively taking money from people. But the question of what it’s OK for us to accept from government is more complicated — at least for those of us who believe it’s wrong for the money to be available in the first place.
I know a couple who are having a difficult time financially right now. She’s working full-time while he finishes his college degree. They have a young child, and it’s a struggle to make it financially. But he’s a libertarian who hasn’t been willing to take any government assistance. His in-laws watch them struggle and seem disapproving that he won’t apply for any kind of government aid. Is he a principled man who we should admire? Or is he a fool for not taking the help that’s available?

I’m shutting the whole world out, but I’m also waiting to be rescued
Genuine love is always extreme — and it rarely makes any sense
We’re slowly losing our religion, but we manage to find new gods
If an election can destroy your life, your priorities are out of whack
Ayn Rand spins in her grave? ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is a bad film
A year later, my father’s death looms large, but I have no regrets
Words I wrote as idealistic teen suggest I’m still the same inside
Whatever you’re doing for Fourth, have a safe and happy holiday
Life as misunderstood stranger feels like walking through a fog