I’m just going to say one thing about the third party presidential debate that’s being held Tuesday night. I won’t be watching the debate and I don’t much care about it. I’m sure my rhetorical sympathies would be with the things said by Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson, but I can’t say that I want anyone to vote for him. I don’t want anyone to vote for anyone, because I don’t want a ruler.
I don’t want a conservative ruler or a progressive ruler or a Green ruler or even a libertarian ruler. The problem is the fact that someone — anyone — is given power over you, not the identity or party label of the person given that power. Even if a third party had a chance to win, it wouldn’t change the root cause of our political situation. It would just hand power to someone slightly different — until the Establishment took back over. So the problem is the system itself, not who gets elected, which is why the third party debate is irrelevant to me, at best.
If you’d like to argue that the two mainstream parties unfairly keep out the other parties, I’ll agree with you. If you want to argue that the “winner take all” system here makes it impossible for smaller minority opinions to have much of a seat at the table of democracy, I’ll agree with you there, too. But arguing about those flaws overlooks the basic issue.
I don’t want any ruler, no matter what party he comes from.

Calm and perspective needed for Boston, not accusations and games
The Alien Observer podcast heads to Planet Earth in weeks to come
Tenn. woman threatened for allowing daughter to ride bike to school
Humans are impatient, but changes in Alabama show speed of change
I’m horrified that it’s become so difficult for me to finish a book
Third parties aren’t any better than two parties if they anoint rulers
Hope can be dangerous when the path ahead is dark and uncertain
If a bad relationship needs to end, fake Facebook posts won’t fool us
Social creatures: We heal each other, but start dying when alone