For several days now, the U.S. government has been doing its best Chicken Little impersonation — even though we still don’t know exactly where the sky is falling or how it’s supposed to be a big deal.
ABC News quotes a source who says the government doesn’t know an “exact target” for an attack, but then the source admits to not having a clue: “We do not know whether they mean an embassy, an airbase, an aircraft, trains,” the source said.
In other words, the sky is falling, but we have no idea what we’re warning people about. Or where it might happened. Or what might happen.
U.S. senators and congressmen sounded grim but vague when they made the rounds of television talk shows on Sunday. U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said the danger is “the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years.” Rep. Michael T. McCaul (R-Texas) said, “And I must say this is probably one of the most specific and credible threats I’ve seen perhaps since 9/11. And that’s why everybody is taking this so seriously.”

Honesty, wisdom and insight teach that we have to live with uncertainty
For a culture where God is dead, spiritual emergence is madness
If president can just ignore laws, what’s the purpose of having laws?
Minnesota protects its citizens from the horrors of free education online
Romantic love is part obsession, part reality — and part madness
We’re becoming so selfish that our old ‘social scripts’ are dying
Freedom matters more than safety, even if you can’t see that
Understanding often matters more than solving someone’s problems
My father’s narcissistic control left me resentful of all authority