THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Oliver, the furball who taught me to love cats

By David McElroy · July 10, 2011

I didn’t want to live with a cat. I certainly didn’t want to live with a cat in my house. I was certain that I didn’t like cats. I was wrong.

Years ago, my ex-wife wanted a cat. She had grown up with felines and had great memories of them. I had grown up with a father who would sooner spontaneously combust than have an animal inside his perfect house, so I knew very, very little of cats or dogs from experience. At best, I was indifferent. But Melissa wanted a cat, so I decided to find one for her.

It was my sister, Mary, who found a stray kitten in Mountain Brook, which is an upscale Birmingham suburb very close to the local zoo. I had mentioned to her that I was looking for a cat, so she called me to come take a look when Melissa wasn’t around — so it would be a surprise for her. I went to Mary’s apartment to see this tiny furball who seemed more like a starving street urchin than the healthy kittens I’d seen in cat food commercials.

I got got down on the floor with him. He came over to me and rubbed against my face — gingerly at first, but then with abandon. I smiled and suddenly felt warmer inside. I didn’t want a cat, but something inside me did. What was I getting into?

For the first couple of weeks that Melissa and I had this little fellow, we were still living in an old high-rise apartment building on Southside that didn’t allow pets. We had just bought a condo in a suburb south of town, but we couldn’t move in quite yet. The apartment manager’s office was in the lobby of the building, which we had to walk through to leave each morning on the way to work. For those two weeks, we smuggled him in and out each day in a bag, always hoping that this wouldn’t be the day he would announce his presence right as the manager eyed us. She didn’t catch us.

I quickly came to love Oliver. We named him for the orphan in the Charles Dickens novel, because he had truly been that pathetic when we found him. He grew fairly quickly into a big cat, topping out at about 18 pounds, leaving us to joke that he had simply escaped from the zoo when Mary found him in Mountain Brook. We think he he was probably part Maine coon. I discovered that I liked and appreciated the cat personality. I loved his odd mixture of independence and affection. Soon, I couldn’t imagine life without a cat.

When Christmas season came the first year we had him, we put up a tree and didn’t think much about it. Oliver didn’t sleep with us, simply because I hadn’t really wanted a cat in the bed at night — a holdover from the attitude I’d learned as a child. On the first morning after the tree went up, I opened the bedroom door to find Christmas decorations strewn down the hall. I followed them to the living room, where I found a destroyed tree and decorations spread around the room as evenly as if they’d been blown to bits. This guy had had a fun night.

Oliver came to be a chubby fellow. OK, let’s be blunt. He was fat. I wasn’t too concerned about it. The guy liked to eat and I didn’t think it made any difference, so he lived a happy and chubby life for his first four years. He knew that his food was kept in a small plastic container in the refrigerator, so he eventually learned to open the ‘fridge. All in all, it was an entertaining life. Any cat owner would recognize it, but it was all new to me.

It was also new to me after four years when he quit eating and started losing weight. We took him to the vet, but the vet couldn’t figure out what was wrong. He was so fat that the vet couldn’t feel much of his body to see what was going on. We just had to keep watching him and hoping he would start eating again. After a couple of weeks of this, he had lost enough weight for the vet to feel something. It seemed as though Oliver had tumors, so he had to have immediate surgery.

I was at work on the day of the surgery, and I was thinking that he would probably be fine. But Melissa got a call from the vet after a couple of hours. “Our little buddy didn’t make it,” the vet said.

It turned out that Oliver had several tumors in advanced states. He was so weak by the time of the surgery that he died from the trauma of the operation. He never had a chance.

Losing Oliver was tough for me, because I’d never lost an animal. Melissa had lost them before, but it still wasn’t easy for her. My first thought was that I didn’t want another cat. If losing them hurt this much, was it really worth it? I quickly got past that shortsighted notion.

Less than a week after Oliver’s death, we had another baby furball in the house. I came to love Oscar and treasure him, but that’s a story for another time. Even though Oliver was gone, he still had a huge presence in my home and in my heart — because he was the one who first taught me to love cats.

Editor’s note: If you enjoyed meeting Munchkin, you might enjoy previous articles about Munchkin, Sam, Maggie, Henry, Lucy, Amelia, Charlotte and Emily.

Share on Social Networks

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

For four years, Donald Trump’s supporters screamed that everything that went wrong was the fault of Joe Biden. They were sometimes right and they were sometimes delusional. (Anybody who knows me understands that I can’t stand Biden any more than I can stand Trump, just for different reasons.) But for two months, Trump has rampaged through U.S. political life — vandalizing pretty much everything in sight — and the vast majority of his supporters are silent at best. Many watch as he blows up the world economy and they make excuses for him. They’re in absolute denial, even about things that Trump is doing very intentionally. Anybody who understands economics and history knows that tariffs are a terrible idea from a pragmatic point of view. Anybody who values individual freedom knows that tariffs are massive taxes on individuals — and they’re a tool of political control over the ability of people to trade freely. Trump is the antithesis of everything which political conservatives stood for just a few years ago. It’s far past time for people who claim to be conservatives to reclaim the principles and values which they used to claim — and stop this mad man before he can accelerate the day when we experience economic and social collapse. Open your eyes to reality and reject this lying narcissist.

Related Posts