Peshawar murders show need to support those who share our values

By David McElroy · December 16, 2014

For those who are committed to the idea that Muslims are evil, the vicious school attack in Peshawar, Pakistan, must be confusing, because it doesn’t fit their script.

Nearly 150 people are known dead in the attack so far — almost all of them children. For Pakistanis, this is the equivalent of about five or six of the killings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012. We were traumatized in this country when 20 children and six adults were killed by a mentally ill man two years ago. The tragedy for my Pakistani friends is far more deadly.

It’s natural for us to see tragedies close to us as more serious than tragedies on the other side of the world. Tragedies in which the victims look like us seem more important to us than those where the victims belong to some other group. But imagine a school attack like this — with at least 132 children intentionally slaughtered — in California or Ohio or Alabama or New Jersey.

This is a tragedy that’s hard for us to comprehend, because we haven’t faced one bigger than this since Sept. 11, 2001.

For those who see the world in terms of “evil Muslims” vs. “good westerners,” the Peshawar massacre doesn’t make sense, because it doesn’t fit within their understanding. Instead, the attackers and the victims were all Muslims. If you start to understand the significance of that, you can see the error that many people make in seeing Muslims — all Muslims — as their enemies.

When Catholics and Protestants brutally killed each other for many years in Northern Ireland, it wasn’t because Christianity was evil. It was because two separate groups wanted very different political futures for that sliver of Ireland — and they were willing to kill to get their way.

When Catholics and Protestants fought wars for many years after the Reformation, it wasn’t because Christianity was evil. It wasn’t because a reasonable understanding of the Gospel of Jesus Christ justified those politically motivated wars. It was because selfish human beings wanted to impose their will on other people.

In the same way, the violence we’ve been seeing for the past few decades from Muslim fundamentalists isn’t because Islam is evil. It’s because predominantly Muslim countries have slowly been modernizing over the last century — and some people don’t like that. Those people want to cling to something that existed only in their own imaginations, so they have created a strict, idealized version of Islam that they demand other people follow — and they are willing to kill Christians or Muslims or Jews or anyone else who refuses to obey.

When I see certain ignorant Americans who rail against all Muslims — because they need someone to blame for the actions of those fundamentalists — I think about the friends I’ve known over the last decade or so who live in countries such as Pakistan, Iran, Jordan and Egypt. All of these friends are Muslims, but all of them are more like you and me than they are like the evil people who slaughtered children in Peshawar.

I recently listened to an interview with a Muslim writer who is originally from Iran but grew up in the United States. Reza Aslan grew up in a Muslim culture and then spent years as a Christian before returning to Islam. His religious beliefs and understanding of the world are nuanced and complex. I don’t agree with him about everything, but he gave me an interesting new way to look at what’s going on among Muslims.

Aslan says the violence coming from fundamentalist Muslims today is a backlash against a “reformation” that has been going on in Islam for years. Over the last century, Islam has slowly modernized and adopted values which the old-fashioned fundamentalists don’t like. Their violence today is an attempt to turn back the clock, he says. I think he’s right. (I highly recommend the entire interview.)

If you’re one of those who sees the world in terms of “Christian vs. Muslim,” please understand that reality is far more complex. The minority of Muslims who truly support the fundamentalist violence against the West and against the modern moderates of their own countries are our enemies, but they’re the enemies of the majority of their countries even more.

There are some evil Muslims. There are some evil Christians. There are some evil atheists. There are evil people among every ethnic group or belief. It’s just part of being human.

We need to work harder to make sure that the people in predominantly Muslim countries understand that we support those who share our values. We also need to work harder to stamp out the ignorant belief that all Muslims are terrorists who are trying to destroy the West.

For Pakistanis and Muslims, there is a lot to mourn right now. They have a lot of anger and sadness to work through. But for those of us observing from afar, it’s a good time to recommit ourselves to supporting these decent human beings who simply want to live good and meaningful lives without fear from monsters trying to kill them or control them.

My heart goes out to the few people I know in Pakistan. You are good people and you have my admiration and support as you continue the fight to make your beautiful country safer and freer.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts