• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

David McElroy

making sense of a dysfunctional culture

  • About
  • Podcasts

Should a rational person question orthodox assumptions on climate?

By David McElroy · June 5, 2017

Do you want to save the planet?

Uh, sure, I guess so.

Do you want a clean environment for everyone in the future?

Of course. Doesn’t everyone?

Or are you a “science denier” who’s out of touch with realty and is in bed with Big Oil?

Of course not. I’m a smart person and I love science. So tell me what I’m supposed to believe!

That’s roughly how the debate on climate change plays out today from those who argue what has become the orthodox position — that human activity is causing the planet to get a warmer and that the increased warmth will cause catastrophic effects.

If you look at the evidence and come to any other conclusion — or if you’re even skeptical about the political solutions presented — you are labeled a “denier,” in a very dishonest attempt to link climate skepticism with Holocaust denial.

It doesn’t help that certain loud and obnoxious people on the other side of the debate are idiots who are full of conspiracy theories and who insist that climate change is a “hoax.” When you frame the debate this way, it’s easy to choose “the science side” instead of “the conspiracy loons.”

But what if there is a reasoned argument for suggesting that the climate change orthodoxy is wrong? If everybody on the “anti” side has been defined as an idiot or a denier of science, who is left to point out that the emperor might not be wearing clothes?

I can’t say for certain what the future holds for Earth’s climate and I can’t say with any certainty whether human activity is making the world any warmer, but I can say that I see plenty of evidence that there are other explanations — and I see even more evidence that the political solutions that have been given to us would be devastating to our quality of life.

The general policies being pushed to stop alleged climate change are suspiciously the same as the policies pushed by the environmental movement back in the 1970s as an answer to allegations that the world was overpopulated and that hundreds of millions of people were about to die because the planet couldn’t grow enough food to feed them.

In college, I took a class about this alleged population problem and the “religious text” for the class was a book called “The Population Bomb,” by scientist Paul Ehrlich. The opening lines of the book warned that hundreds of millions of people would die in the ’70s from starvation brought on by overpopulation — and Ehrlich warned darkly that it was too late to stop these deaths.

I thought the book seemed alarmist and I was the only one in my class of about 15 who said so. The others agreed with the two professors running the seminar-style class that population control should be forced on everyone by government. (I did good work in the class but I made a B. I can’t prove it, but I’ll always believe it was because I didn’t agree with the line the professors preached.)

Ehrlich turned out to be wrong.

Even though later editions of his book kept modifying his predictions, those predictions still haven’t come true. He was simply wrong. Even though he was a scientist — a biologist, to be specific — he misunderstood the complex interplay of science and economics that would determine the future of humanity.

I suspect the same is true in the debate over alleged climate change. I believe a lot of good people have been fooled into supporting bad political prescriptions by their faith in predictions that can’t be tested. That doesn’t mean their theories are a hoax. It simply means they might very well be wrong.

It’s often argued that even if the climate change theory is wrong, adopting political programs to combat it will create a cleaner planet, but that ignores the very real consequences of what the Paris Agreement would do. It would be devastating to the lifestyles of those of us who live in the West — while it would allow people in developing countries to go right on producing even more pollution for decades.

If you have a sincere desire to find out whether you should question the orthodox consensus on climate change, I ask you to take the time to carefully consider the cases made by some bright people who are just as sincere as the allegedly “pro science” side of the argument. I’m not going to discuss the arguments involved in each — because this is very complex and they can make their arguments better than I can — but if you are sincere in your desire to know the truth, please take the time to consider some of the following.

First, read the actual text of the Paris Agreement for yourself.

Next, read this nice summary from the Foundation for Economic Education of the reasons to consider that there are other legitimate considerations in this debate. This is a complicated article that covers a lot of ground. It’s not just rhetoric, so pay attention to the specifics.

Listen to this 20-minute podcast from Reason magazine last week of an interview with environmentalist Bjørn Lomborg, who believes humans are causing some warming but that the orthodox approach is wrong-headed. Lomborg is an orthodox statist who believes in spending billions or trillions in tax money to fix the world’s problems, but he explains why the current approach is wrong even if you believe in coercive taxation.

One of the most consistently level-headed people on the idea of climate change has been English writer Matt Ridley. In this hour-long episode of EconTalk from two years ago, he argues that human activity is indeed causing a slight increase in global temperatures, but he says the effects won’t be what alarmists are predicting. He calls himself a “lukewarmer.”

Finally, consider that the climate system is more complex than scientists currently understand. Some scientists who study the sun believe that changes in solar activity mean we are looking at a mini ice age starting around 2030. These scientists think the global climate is more complicated than what their colleagues in other fields believe — and they think solar activity controls far more than current orthodox climate science understands.

I believe the weight of the evidence strongly suggests that we don’t yet understand enough about how climate operates to be tinkering with changing it — and I believe the evidence is even stronger that the political changes proposed wouldn’t cure the alleged problem and would also be devastating to our modern lifestyles.

If someone tells you “the science is settled” and that you are a “denier” if you question a broad political agenda that would change our world for centuries to come, you might want to consider that the person might have a deeper agenda. And even if he were completely sincere in his beliefs, he might very well be wrong.

Paul Ehrlich was wrong in his alarmist predictions in the ’70s about hundreds of millions of deaths from overpopulation, but he still won’t admit he was wrong. That’s what happens when your political agenda trumps your training as a scientist.

Believe what the evidence leads you to believe. Reasonable people can obviously disagree. But it’s completely dishonest to pretend that anyone who questions the orthodox view is a “science denier.” There is serious, legitimate justification — based in science and reason — to believe the priests of the Church of Global Warming are simply wrong.

Don’t let social engineers intimidate you into accepting their political agenda without investigating the facts for yourself.

Share on Social Networks

Related Posts

  • My verdict: Zimmerman’s no hero, but he’s also not guilty of murder
  • All sides rushing to assign blame in theater shootings only leads to error
  • If bigots can be stripped of rights,
    will your rights be the next to go?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

I just remembered that I shot photos Friday evenin I just remembered that I shot photos Friday evening just before sunset. These two shots were only about a minute apart, just with different lenses. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
As far as I know, there were no nuclear devices se As far as I know, there were no nuclear devices set off anywhere near Birmingham this evening, but this cloud formation looked very much like a mushroom cloud rising in the west as I went through downtown Birmingham on I-65 around 6:30 tonight. #nature #naturephotography #sky #clouds #birmingham #alabama
For many years, I’ve believed that I could deliv For many years, I’ve believed that I could deliver some message worth sharing through audio or video if I just had the right platform. It’s always been an intuitive feeling, not a specific plan. And now that I have the technology in place to do a wide variety of media, that nasty old inner critic rears its head, asking whether I really have anything worthwhile to say. And as I sit here practicing, I still have no idea who’s right — my long-term intuition or my harsh inner critic.
Just after sunset Friday evening, there was quite Just after sunset Friday evening, there was quite a pastel light show in the sky to the west of me. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
This is the Thursday evening sunset that I just wa This is the Thursday evening sunset that I just watched behind a restaurant in Moody. It’s been raining all evening, but it cleared just enough for some colorful light to poke through the clouds. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I just realized that I had some other photos from I just realized that I had some other photos from Wednesday night’s sunset which I could have posted. I ended up posting an iPhone panorama, but this is what a section of that looked like with the Sony A7 IV instead. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
Just a minute before the sun slipped beneath the h Just a minute before the sun slipped beneath the horizon, the late-evening light was colorful and magical Thursday. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I didn’t have a lens wide enough to capture this I didn’t have a lens wide enough to capture this with my “real” camera, so this is just an iPhone panorama. It was beautiful to see in person. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I just heard that tonight’s moon is something ca I just heard that tonight’s moon is something called a “supermoon,” so I photographed it to see if I could see anything unusual, but it looked pretty much the same to me. What exactly is different about this one? Does anyone know? #nature #naturephotography #sky #moon #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Critter Instagram

For “throwback Thursday, let me introduce you to For “throwback Thursday, let me introduce you to Sam. In 2009, I took in a young feral cat who I named for the early American revolutionary Samuel Adams. He was one of the most confident — downright arrogant, in fact — cats I’ve ever been around. He had an amazing personality and I immediately loved him. He was no more than 8 or 9 months old when he suddenly died for reasons that my vet couldn’t explain. Even though I had him only a short time, he was one of my all-time favorites. #tbt #cats #tabby #feral #birmingham #alabama
I’ve never been as curious about what a cat migh I’ve never been as curious about what a cat might be thinking as I constantly am about Merlin. As I watch him sitting here on the edge of my desk late Wednesday night, I can’t help but conclude he’s a very deep thinker. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Lucy has been happily rolling around in the freshl Lucy has been happily rolling around in the freshly cut grass of the back yard Wednesday evening. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Thomas believes that he is the Most Interesting Ca Thomas believes that he is the Most Interesting Cat in the World — and I can’t say he’s wrong tonight. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Merlin is ready for me to turn the last of the off Merlin is ready for me to turn the last of the office lights off so he and Thomas can sleep peacefully without me muttering to myself as I write. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Lucy just finished a Neighborhood Watch patrol and Lucy just finished a Neighborhood Watch patrol and now she’s cooling off in the back yard before heading inside for dinner. Her work is never done. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Except when he’s asleep, Thomas always looks as Except when he’s asleep, Thomas always looks as though he’s on high alert and ready to run away from danger. His feral early years still dominate his internal programming. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Lucy just finished her last walk of the day, but s Lucy just finished her last walk of the day, but she still wants more attention. She’s sitting in front of me looking expectantly. She seems certain that we will go outside for one more adventure if she’s persistent enough. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
My favorite photos of Merlin tend to be those — My favorite photos of Merlin tend to be those — such as this one — in which he seems to be contemplating difficult issues. Feline philosophy or quantum physics or something else that he figures I wouldn’t understand. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #merlin2024 #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturday
Follow on Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)




Search

Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

On a live awards show Sunday night, one man made a joke about a female celebrity. The husband of the celebrity was offended and hit the man who made the joke. Or maybe it was staged for entertainment. Who knows? Who cares? Social media is full of discussion — and even arguments — about this idiocy today. This baffles me. Let’s assume for a moment that the event happened as reported. People have been having such idiotic fights ever since there have been humans. Half the bars in the world see such brief dustups regularly. It simply doesn’t matter. The fact that so many people believe they need to talk about this — or even need to have opinions about it — is more evidence of the bizarre media brainwashing that convinces many to care passionately about brain-dead trivia. Your life will be happier and saner if you focus on yourself, your family and your friends, not on whatever scripted (or spontaneous) bilge that the media wants to pipe into your home.

I’m in the middle of migrating this website to new servers this week. This means you might encounter some unexpected behavior until I get all the bugs worked out. Clicking on my links (including this one) might cause your browser to give you the message that it’s a site without a current security certificate. It’s not actually unsafe, but there’s something which isn’t yet set up for the security certificate. I apologize for any such errors you might encounter while the process is going on. If you notice any problems with content which didn’t migrate properly, I would appreciate you letting me know the details at davidmcelroy@mac.com. Thanks for your patience.

I often wonder what animals think when they look at us and consider the society we’ve created. Yes, I know this is fanciful and unrealistic, but what if they could? Would they be astounded at how we treat each other? Would they be disgusted by the ugliness and pettiness which fill so many of our daily interactions? The truth is that I’m feeling pretty disgusted with humanity tonight. I made the mistake of reading some online interactions that I should have avoided — and it sickened me. The people involved appeared to be vile and stupid and arrogant. I wish I could pretend they’re a tiny minority, but I know better. It’s times such as this when I most need to escape much of “civilization” and disconnect from their world. If humans are going to be worthy of “ruling this planet,” we have a lot of growth to do. And I fear that growth is nowhere in sight. So my buddy Thomas, above, and all of his friends would be right to judge us harshly — and to think, “Why do you folks get to be in charge?”

I should have expected this, but I honestly didn’t. The article I wrote last week about disagreements over treatment for autistic children brought me angry emails. You could almost call it “hate mail.” Of the five emails about it so far, two have been to tell me that I’m wrong to even listen to critics of the most popular therapy for autistic children — and the other three tell me I’m wrong for not condemning the treatment as the “obvious” abuse it is. If you read the article, you know I didn’t take a position on the issue, because I simply don’t know enough to have an opinion. But by talking about the issue, I stepped into a heated controversy. The emails from the two sides convinced me of nothing. But they did give me even more empathy for the unfortunate parents who have to figure out for themselves where the truth lies for their children.

Have you ever had what you thought was a new idea — and then discovered that “old you” had the same idea years ago? I had that experience tonight. And it’s been wonderful. I came up with an idea tonight for a very short satirical film that would be a promotion for a fictitious college. The point is to make the college promote — as good things — everything which is actually terrible about most modern colleges. Then I remembered a fake college that I invented back when I was in college. I had created student recruitment brochures and various newsletters back then, so I decided to call my “new” college by the same name I’d invented years ago: Ochita College. As I searched my computer for any old material I might still have about Ochita from the past, I discovered an email I sent to someone in 2009 — outlining essentially the same idea which I came up with tonight. Since I didn’t remember writing that, it felt like magic. So my next film project just might be this one instead. If all goes well, you might soon see “Ochita College: Your Future Starts Here.” This should be fun.

Read More

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this ad. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and I thank you. (If you’re using an ad-blocker and can’t see the ad, you can click here instead.)

© 2011–2022 · All Rights Reserved
Built by: 1955 DESIGN