• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

David McElroy

making sense of a dysfunctional culture

  • About
  • Podcasts

Should a rational person question orthodox assumptions on climate?

By David McElroy · June 5, 2017

Do you want to save the planet?

Uh, sure, I guess so.

Do you want a clean environment for everyone in the future?

Of course. Doesn’t everyone?

Or are you a “science denier” who’s out of touch with realty and is in bed with Big Oil?

Of course not. I’m a smart person and I love science. So tell me what I’m supposed to believe!

That’s roughly how the debate on climate change plays out today from those who argue what has become the orthodox position — that human activity is causing the planet to get a warmer and that the increased warmth will cause catastrophic effects.

If you look at the evidence and come to any other conclusion — or if you’re even skeptical about the political solutions presented — you are labeled a “denier,” in a very dishonest attempt to link climate skepticism with Holocaust denial.

It doesn’t help that certain loud and obnoxious people on the other side of the debate are idiots who are full of conspiracy theories and who insist that climate change is a “hoax.” When you frame the debate this way, it’s easy to choose “the science side” instead of “the conspiracy loons.”

But what if there is a reasoned argument for suggesting that the climate change orthodoxy is wrong? If everybody on the “anti” side has been defined as an idiot or a denier of science, who is left to point out that the emperor might not be wearing clothes?

I can’t say for certain what the future holds for Earth’s climate and I can’t say with any certainty whether human activity is making the world any warmer, but I can say that I see plenty of evidence that there are other explanations — and I see even more evidence that the political solutions that have been given to us would be devastating to our quality of life.

The general policies being pushed to stop alleged climate change are suspiciously the same as the policies pushed by the environmental movement back in the 1970s as an answer to allegations that the world was overpopulated and that hundreds of millions of people were about to die because the planet couldn’t grow enough food to feed them.

In college, I took a class about this alleged population problem and the “religious text” for the class was a book called “The Population Bomb,” by scientist Paul Ehrlich. The opening lines of the book warned that hundreds of millions of people would die in the ’70s from starvation brought on by overpopulation — and Ehrlich warned darkly that it was too late to stop these deaths.

I thought the book seemed alarmist and I was the only one in my class of about 15 who said so. The others agreed with the two professors running the seminar-style class that population control should be forced on everyone by government. (I did good work in the class but I made a B. I can’t prove it, but I’ll always believe it was because I didn’t agree with the line the professors preached.)

Ehrlich turned out to be wrong.

Even though later editions of his book kept modifying his predictions, those predictions still haven’t come true. He was simply wrong. Even though he was a scientist — a biologist, to be specific — he misunderstood the complex interplay of science and economics that would determine the future of humanity.

I suspect the same is true in the debate over alleged climate change. I believe a lot of good people have been fooled into supporting bad political prescriptions by their faith in predictions that can’t be tested. That doesn’t mean their theories are a hoax. It simply means they might very well be wrong.

It’s often argued that even if the climate change theory is wrong, adopting political programs to combat it will create a cleaner planet, but that ignores the very real consequences of what the Paris Agreement would do. It would be devastating to the lifestyles of those of us who live in the West — while it would allow people in developing countries to go right on producing even more pollution for decades.

If you have a sincere desire to find out whether you should question the orthodox consensus on climate change, I ask you to take the time to carefully consider the cases made by some bright people who are just as sincere as the allegedly “pro science” side of the argument. I’m not going to discuss the arguments involved in each — because this is very complex and they can make their arguments better than I can — but if you are sincere in your desire to know the truth, please take the time to consider some of the following.

First, read the actual text of the Paris Agreement for yourself.

Next, read this nice summary from the Foundation for Economic Education of the reasons to consider that there are other legitimate considerations in this debate. This is a complicated article that covers a lot of ground. It’s not just rhetoric, so pay attention to the specifics.

Listen to this 20-minute podcast from Reason magazine last week of an interview with environmentalist Bjørn Lomborg, who believes humans are causing some warming but that the orthodox approach is wrong-headed. Lomborg is an orthodox statist who believes in spending billions or trillions in tax money to fix the world’s problems, but he explains why the current approach is wrong even if you believe in coercive taxation.

One of the most consistently level-headed people on the idea of climate change has been English writer Matt Ridley. In this hour-long episode of EconTalk from two years ago, he argues that human activity is indeed causing a slight increase in global temperatures, but he says the effects won’t be what alarmists are predicting. He calls himself a “lukewarmer.”

Finally, consider that the climate system is more complex than scientists currently understand. Some scientists who study the sun believe that changes in solar activity mean we are looking at a mini ice age starting around 2030. These scientists think the global climate is more complicated than what their colleagues in other fields believe — and they think solar activity controls far more than current orthodox climate science understands.

I believe the weight of the evidence strongly suggests that we don’t yet understand enough about how climate operates to be tinkering with changing it — and I believe the evidence is even stronger that the political changes proposed wouldn’t cure the alleged problem and would also be devastating to our modern lifestyles.

If someone tells you “the science is settled” and that you are a “denier” if you question a broad political agenda that would change our world for centuries to come, you might want to consider that the person might have a deeper agenda. And even if he were completely sincere in his beliefs, he might very well be wrong.

Paul Ehrlich was wrong in his alarmist predictions in the ’70s about hundreds of millions of deaths from overpopulation, but he still won’t admit he was wrong. That’s what happens when your political agenda trumps your training as a scientist.

Believe what the evidence leads you to believe. Reasonable people can obviously disagree. But it’s completely dishonest to pretend that anyone who questions the orthodox view is a “science denier.” There is serious, legitimate justification — based in science and reason — to believe the priests of the Church of Global Warming are simply wrong.

Don’t let social engineers intimidate you into accepting their political agenda without investigating the facts for yourself.

Share on Social Networks

Related Posts

  • Social media is an addictive drug, so I’m kicking my Facebook habitSocial media is an addictive drug, so I’m kicking my Facebook habit
  • I’m the common denominator for all of my dysfunctional romances
  • He couldn’t mold her into himself, but my dad broke Mother’s spirit

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

This was the view just after sunset Tuesday evenin This was the view just after sunset Tuesday evening near my house. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
At sunset Tuesday evening, the cloud cover over me At sunset Tuesday evening, the cloud cover over me was solidly gray and black, but one tiny break in the clouds appeared just for a few minutes to show a little bit of sunset’s colorful light. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I just remembered that I caught the sun just befor I just remembered that I caught the sun just before it slipped beneath the horizon Tuesday evening. This is near my house just east of Birmingham. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
This was another experiment with a moon photo — This was another experiment with a moon photo — with my iPhone — but I allowed the moon to be overexposed in order to get the clouds in the foreground to show up. I’d really like to figure out how pros do shots of this sort. I don’t have it even close to right. #nature #naturephotography #sky #clouds #moon #iphone14
This is the sunset I just watched right after dinn This is the sunset I just watched right after dinner. It was one of the most vibrantly colorful displays I’ve seen in weeks. It was really beautiful. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
I don’t have the right lens to photograph the mo I don’t have the right lens to photograph the moon properly, but there are some nights when I try anyway. The longest lens I have goes to 240mm, which means I have to enlarge a tiny part of the frame way too much. But even if I had the right lens, I’m not sure I’ve figured out how to expose the moon decently while still showing some stars around it. Tonight’s attempt has given me a grainy moon and pinpricks of stars that become invisible when viewed at normal size. (Blow this up with your fingers in the app and you can see the tiny stars.) I really want to learn how to do this better, so if anyone has tips for me, I’d be happy to hear them. #nature #naturephotography #sky #moon
It’s been really hot in Birmingham today, so I’ve been thinking about how much I’m looking forward to fall. My iPhone must’ve been reading my mind, because it just showed this photo from November 2016 to me as a featured photo from my library. I remember this day well. It was in Trussville, which is just east of Birmingham. #nature #naturephotography #colorful #autumn #autumnleaves #birmingham #alabama
I just remembered this sunset photo that I took th I just remembered this sunset photo that I took this evening when I had stopped to get gasoline on I-20 just east of Birmingham. I was pumping gas when I suddenly realized the sky had erupted with bright pastel colors. I didn’t have time to get my “real” camera, so I just quickly shot two frames with my iPhone at the edge of the parking lot. It keeps surprising me just how good cameras on our smartphones have become. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
We had dark and stormy skies all day in Birmingham We had dark and stormy skies all day in Birmingham, but there was a little bit of light that was finally able to poke through the darkness right at sunset along U.S. 411 just east of Birmingham. #nature #naturephotography #sky #colorful #clouds #sunset #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Critter Instagram

Lucy is doing her Neighborhood Watch duties about Lucy is doing her Neighborhood Watch duties about half a mile from home late Friday night. No matter how many times we do this, the sounds of the night always fascinate her. Watch the way her ears are constantly adjusting to pick up on something else. #dog #dogs #dogstagram #dogsofinstagram #cute #cutedog #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #instadog #ilovedogs #birmingham #alabama
Alex has been battling this little toy mouse for t Alex has been battling this little toy mouse for the last hour or so. A friend sent him several of these last December and he just discovered one of them tonight. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturdayeve
Now that his big brother is gone, Alex has decided Now that his big brother is gone, Alex has decided he has to be the alpha cat around the house, so he has his fiercest face on display. I don’t think anybody is going to want to mess with this powerful predator. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama #caturdayeve
Alex seems to have regained his composure by late Alex seems to have regained his composure by late Thursday night. I don’t know what he might or might not feel about Thomas’s death, but his behavior seems to be returning to what is normal for him. He still wants to be very close to me, but that has always been a key feature of his personality. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
For “throwback Thursday,” I think it’s appro For “throwback Thursday,” I think it’s appropriate to go back to 2011 for the first photo I was ever able to get with Thomas. He was still living outside my house and I was feeding him on the porch. It took me quite awhile to get him to let me hold him long enough for this brief photo, but he clawed his way out of my arms very quickly. This was the very first photo that I used when I was still trying to find a home for him in October 2011 — before I took him inside to stay soon afterward. #tbt #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
I just got home for the evening and laid down on t I just got home for the evening and laid down on the bed, not realizing how quickly Alex would be lying on my chest purring. I think he’s happy that I’m home. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Alex still looks like a man who just lost his best Alex still looks like a man who just lost his best friend today, but he’s a lot closer to acting like his normal self than he was last night. I wish we could know how a cat or dog goes about processing the loss of a companion. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Alex has calmed down quite a bit. I hope tomorrow Alex has calmed down quite a bit. I hope tomorrow will seem more routine for him. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Alex still seems confused tonight, but he finally Alex still seems confused tonight, but he finally ate a little bit of food. I know that he’ll be back to his normal self pretty quickly, but it really does seem as though Thomas’s death this afternoon has left him perplexed. #cat #cats #catstagram #catsofinstagram #cute #cutecat #pets #petstagram #petsofinstagram #tabby #tabbycat #instacat #ilovecats #birmingham #alabama
Follow on Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)




Search

Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

On a live awards show Sunday night, one man made a joke about a female celebrity. The husband of the celebrity was offended and hit the man who made the joke. Or maybe it was staged for entertainment. Who knows? Who cares? Social media is full of discussion — and even arguments — about this idiocy today. This baffles me. Let’s assume for a moment that the event happened as reported. People have been having such idiotic fights ever since there have been humans. Half the bars in the world see such brief dustups regularly. It simply doesn’t matter. The fact that so many people believe they need to talk about this — or even need to have opinions about it — is more evidence of the bizarre media brainwashing that convinces many to care passionately about brain-dead trivia. Your life will be happier and saner if you focus on yourself, your family and your friends, not on whatever scripted (or spontaneous) bilge that the media wants to pipe into your home.

I’m in the middle of migrating this website to new servers this week. This means you might encounter some unexpected behavior until I get all the bugs worked out. Clicking on my links (including this one) might cause your browser to give you the message that it’s a site without a current security certificate. It’s not actually unsafe, but there’s something which isn’t yet set up for the security certificate. I apologize for any such errors you might encounter while the process is going on. If you notice any problems with content which didn’t migrate properly, I would appreciate you letting me know the details at davidmcelroy@mac.com. Thanks for your patience.

I often wonder what animals think when they look at us and consider the society we’ve created. Yes, I know this is fanciful and unrealistic, but what if they could? Would they be astounded at how we treat each other? Would they be disgusted by the ugliness and pettiness which fill so many of our daily interactions? The truth is that I’m feeling pretty disgusted with humanity tonight. I made the mistake of reading some online interactions that I should have avoided — and it sickened me. The people involved appeared to be vile and stupid and arrogant. I wish I could pretend they’re a tiny minority, but I know better. It’s times such as this when I most need to escape much of “civilization” and disconnect from their world. If humans are going to be worthy of “ruling this planet,” we have a lot of growth to do. And I fear that growth is nowhere in sight. So my buddy Thomas, above, and all of his friends would be right to judge us harshly — and to think, “Why do you folks get to be in charge?”

I should have expected this, but I honestly didn’t. The article I wrote last week about disagreements over treatment for autistic children brought me angry emails. You could almost call it “hate mail.” Of the five emails about it so far, two have been to tell me that I’m wrong to even listen to critics of the most popular therapy for autistic children — and the other three tell me I’m wrong for not condemning the treatment as the “obvious” abuse it is. If you read the article, you know I didn’t take a position on the issue, because I simply don’t know enough to have an opinion. But by talking about the issue, I stepped into a heated controversy. The emails from the two sides convinced me of nothing. But they did give me even more empathy for the unfortunate parents who have to figure out for themselves where the truth lies for their children.

Have you ever had what you thought was a new idea — and then discovered that “old you” had the same idea years ago? I had that experience tonight. And it’s been wonderful. I came up with an idea tonight for a very short satirical film that would be a promotion for a fictitious college. The point is to make the college promote — as good things — everything which is actually terrible about most modern colleges. Then I remembered a fake college that I invented back when I was in college. I had created student recruitment brochures and various newsletters back then, so I decided to call my “new” college by the same name I’d invented years ago: Ochita College. As I searched my computer for any old material I might still have about Ochita from the past, I discovered an email I sent to someone in 2009 — outlining essentially the same idea which I came up with tonight. Since I didn’t remember writing that, it felt like magic. So my next film project just might be this one instead. If all goes well, you might soon see “Ochita College: Your Future Starts Here.” This should be fun.

Read More

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this link. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and Lucy will thank you. And so will I.

© 2011–2023 · All Rights Reserved
Built by: 1955 DESIGN