The more I understand humans, the less I believe we’ll ever all get along

By David McElroy · April 7, 2018

I’m not a misanthrope, but I can come across as one sometimes. It’s one of the downsides of feeling like an alien among human beings.

I need people, but I need “my kind of people.” Most of the time, I don’t feel as though I’m around anybody like me. That doesn’t mean I hate the people around me, but it does make me feel like an alien on the wrong planet — someone who’s longing for home. For wherever his people are.

One of the enduring assumptions of the modern liberal age is that we’re all basically alike and that everyone in the world will eventually get along together in perfect harmony. This is a very flawed belief. Although humans share a lot of biological similarities, the differences caused by personality, culture, religion and ideology are far deeper. This is why we can’t stand each other.

I’ve come to understand that very few people are like me — and very few people want what I want in life. This means the best we can do is learn to leave each other alone to live in peace.

I find myself frustrated with a lot of people — and a lot of people find themselves frustrated with me. Everyone who’s thought seriously about differences between people has experienced this, but most people are quick to dismiss those unlike themselves with ugly judgments.

“He’s just weird.”

“She’s too stupid to understand anything.”

“Anybody who believes that must be an idiot.”

“All of those people are just evil. They don’t have any real ideas.”

The more you understand human beings — especially through the lens of personality, in my view — the harder it is to glibly dismiss people in these ways. That doesn’t mean I never fall into the old name-calling habit in my own mind — calling people stupid or evil or worse — but if you have tools to help you understand the differences, it’s easier to see things from other people’s points of view, even if you’re never going to agree with them.

Take personality differences as an example. I found myself very annoyed at someone earlier this week and then realized it was simply because he and I look at the world in very different ways. Using the Enneagram personality typing system, I can see that he’s a Type 6 — a type which is security-oriented and concerned with loyalty and making safe choices above all — while I’m a Type 4 — a type which is oriented toward feelings and creative expression.

His basic nature drives him to seek something which is relatively trivial to me and my basic nature drives me to seek something which he genuinely doesn’t understand. To me, he seems plodding and overly fearful. To him, I seem like a careless risk-taker who’s willing to follow intuition. Even when we’re faced with exactly the same facts, we’re going to come to very different conclusions.

The Enneagram is just one personality system. You could make the same comparisons using any system. You’re going to find huge variations in what drives people’s basic actions and attitudes. What’s more, most people haven’t a clue why they do the things they do. So it’s easy for them to assume that others — who are driven by different instincts, which are essentially invisible to them, too — are stupid or crazy or evil.

Personality or temperament is a deep layer of differences which we don’t understand in each other, but then we layer on additional differences, too. We grow up being taught different ideologies and different religions and different cultures. Even when we’re not fully aware that we’re being taught certain things as normal, we absorb things from other people — and we unconsciously start judging those who are different.

I know better than to think we’re ever all going to get along and agree with one another. Earlier in my life, I was under the delusion — which is common to most people — that others would agree with me if I simply explained to them well enough why I was right. I now know that we’re never going to agree, because of the differences in our basic nature combined with the radically different things our cultures and experiences have taught us.

This doesn’t mean I’m right. It doesn’t mean that person or the other person is right. It just means we’re never going to see things in the same way.

The best thing about periodically feeling alienated from the world is that it allows you to be brutally honest with yourself about the absurdities of human life — because you don’t feel any knee-jerk defensiveness for the human race when you feel so disconnected from it. Because I do feel like an alien much of the time, I don’t feel the need to defend human nature and “explain” how we can all get along.

Instead, I accept that we are all radically different and want different things.

I’m not going to like a lot of people — and a lot of people aren’t going to like me. That’s perfectly OK. There are very few people around whom I’m going to feel at home and who are going to accept the parts of my personality that would baffle a lot of people. I want different things from what most of you want. Your motives probably confuse me, too. Again, that’s OK. There’s nothing wrong with that.

The best thing we can do is to start understanding ourselves and each other better — so we can figure out why other people come to such radically different conclusions and beliefs. Yes, a lot of people might seem stupid to us. A few truly are evil. But most are simply “wired up” in very different ways than we are.

Understanding the ways in which we’re different — and being honest about the reasons for those differences — can go a long way toward keeping the peace. We have to learn that it’s OK to be different.

We have to learn that it’s OK to let other people think and act and live in ways that we disapprove of — even if that means we have to separate ourselves into groups of like-minded people.

Note: As a side note, I find that I can generally deal well with people of Enneagram Types 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 when they’re emotionally healthy. I seem to have a special affinity for Types 3, 4 and 5, presumably because they’re the ones right around my own Type 4. Types 6, 7 and 8 are far more problematic for me.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts