Faith and fear collide where dreams and reality come together

By David McElroy · March 7, 2020

Where is the line between what’s real and what’s just the wispy figment of dreams?

For years, I’ve dreamed about meeting a woman and a little girl at an underground train station. One of them — the woman, I believe — is wearing a solid red coat. Her daughter’s coat is either black or gray. They’re meeting me here, but I’ve never known why.

In the last week, I’ve dreamed about that station twice, for the first time in a long time. But there was something entirely different this time. In the dream, I was in my own house — not the modest house where I live now, but a grander house — and I heard a woman’s voice call to me from behind a wall.

I reached out with my hands and broke through the wall — ridiculous, of course — and discovered a secret stone stairway that led to a lower level. When I followed the stairs, I came out on a giant abandoned train platform. It was the same one from my old dreams.

This train station I’d seen for years was hidden under my own home. And the woman was there, too.

I constantly experience a fierce inner battle between faith and fear.

I want to follow the truth as my heart allows me to see it. I want to follow what seems to be the voice of my Creator to be what I was put on this Earth to do and be. But following that voice requires me to ignore the voices of my culture. It requires me to live in what others consider to be a dream world. It requires turning my back on what most people consider “the real world.”

I suspect this is true for most people who feel called by some still small voice to experience lives which are radically different from what the conventional wisdom of their cultures demand of them.

But something in me tells me that the images I see in my inner world are more real than the reality which I share with other people. When I listen to that inner voice — and I believe in things I can’t see or explain or prove — I feel an absolute conviction about where I’m going.

When I listen to other people — those who are “realistic” and “practical” — the faith vanishes like shattering glass and it’s replaced in a flash with deep fear of failure and humiliation and shame.

I can’t follow both paths. If I’m to follow the path of faith, I have to believe and set aside the voices which tell me to follow the world’s path.

And if I can’t have faith, the fear will always return and drag me away from this inner world of spirit which seems more real than anything else.

I can’t have both, because faith and fear are opposites.

As I walked down the stone steps in my dream to this hidden train station, my conscious mind knew what this represented. I’ve always known that finding new parts of my own house in dreams means uncovering hidden parts of myself. This is a widely accepted interpretation in dream psychology — and it felt true here.

For the first time, I was discovering that this scene I had experienced in past dreams wasn’t just some random place. This place was a part of my own psyche. I wasn’t sure what it represented, but it was a revelation that this meeting place has always been a hidden part of myself.

The woman was on the platform below, but she wasn’t here to stay — not yet. She had to come tell me that she was coming again. I’m honestly not certain who she was. I thought I knew at one point in the past, but maybe that was just wishful thinking. I’m not sure.

All I know is that this was a joyous meeting that had to be brief and secret. She was here to tell me that she was coming. She could stay only a few minutes right now, but they were precious minutes that meant everything to me. She needed me to know she was coming — and there was something I had to do to be prepared for us to meet again.

The meeting wasn’t filled with a lot of explanation, at least not that I can remember. It was mostly just the emotional relief and the emotional high of finally settling what needed to be done. It was about exhilaration and joy and relief and happiness all rolled into one scene.

I dreamed bits and pieces of this on a couple of different recent nights.

That reality feels more solid than everything I’ve physically done today. It feels more real than the time I spent at a birthday party this afternoon with 30 people. She felt more real than any of the people there. It felt more real than the other places I visited later in the day. It felt more real than anything else in my life.

Everything about that world represents following something higher and nobler and more important than the mundane world where I live — and waste my life — most of the time.

And something in me says I have to choose between the two.

In the New Testament book of Hebrews, there is a verse which electrified me when I discovered it back when I was in high school. It says — in the translation which I memorized at the time — “To have faith is to be sure of the things we hope for, to be certain of the things we cannot see.”

That verse astonished me. Then I found various passages of the Gospels which quote Jesus teaching about the power of belief. For instance, I’ve never found any way to interpret what Jesus said in Mark 11:22-24 which didn’t confirm the verse in Hebrews.

Here’s that passage:

“And Jesus answered them, ‘Have faith in God. Truly, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain, “Be taken up and thrown into the sea,” and does not doubt in his heart, but believes that what he says will come to pass, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours.'”

As a Christian and as a rational person, I have two choices here. Jesus was either telling the truth — meaning I can count on this in faith — or else Jesus was lying and there’s no sense in believing anything he said.

My heart has always told me that he meant what he said — and that he spoke truth — but my head is so influenced by a material world where everyone expects me to be “practical” that I have ignored this power which he says is reality.

My faith and my fear constantly collide. The people around me don’t want me to act in faith. The culture around me says that I have to do things the world’s way — even if I pretend to believe in the power of Jesus — in order to be practical and do things the reasonable way.

I just know that the world of my dreams — the world where this woman is coming back to meet me at this train station and the world where I create what I was born to make — puts me on a path which doesn’t look realistic to the pragmatic world around me.

I just know that when I look at the things I need to accomplish — in cold, hard terms — it seems impossible and it seems that I need to let my fear drive me to make compromises. When I think that way, I want to set aside what I know is true in order to build a life that others would approve of.

When I’m able to live inside that dream world — not just the woman and the train platform, but all the things which seem to be my purpose — it feels more real than anything else. And I feel like the most powerful person on the planet when I’m able to live inside that faith and rock-solid belief. (I recently talked about the things that are becoming more clear as the themes I need to explore in the message I have to “preach.”)

I can’t live in the fear and also live in the faith. I can’t live in the faith and say, “Well, I’ll still do this other thing, just in case this is all a lie.”

Faith is about landing on a foreign shore to invade a powerful adversary and then burning the ships which brought you, cutting off the path of retreat.

That is the life I have to choose. I know that. But the fear — from the culture and the well-meaning people around me — is still powerful.

I want to walk back down those steps in my psyche and be there to greet this woman when she returns. I want to do great things with her, whoever she is. I want to live a life of faith that leads to the places I need to be.

I need the faith to live in that place — and I need the right woman with the faith to live there with me — but my faith is weak and I’m prone to fear.

I believe I know which vision is real and which is an illusion. But if I keep running back to listen to my fears, I will never have the faith to be certain of the things I cannot yet see.

My flesh is full of fear, but my spirit yearns to live in the bright light of faith and conviction.

Note: The photo above is actually of an abandoned underground subway platform in New York City. I’ve never found a picture that looks exactly like the one I’ve seen in my dreams.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts