When we sell Jesus like soap, maybe we’re spiritually bankrupt

By David McElroy · September 30, 2020

“The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians, who acknowledge Jesus with their lips, then walk out the door, and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable.”
— Brennan Manning, “The Ragamuffin Gospel”

When I was in college, I somehow landed a contract to produce an ad campaign for the largest Baptist church in Tuscaloosa.

I wasn’t qualified for the job, but the father of a friend of mine was an influential deacon at the church. She had told him about me — and apparently convinced him I would be great — so he approached me about the work. I wrote and produced a couple of television spots, several radio spots, newspaper ads and printed flyers.

I’m sorry to say that my work was very forgettable.

I was naive enough — and arrogant enough — to believe I was smart enough to sell faith in a new way. I was studying marketing and various forms of communication in college, so I became convinced the church would be smart to use modern marketing methods. It all made sense.

I now understand how wrong I was, but it seems that most of the modern church makes the same mistake I made many years ago.

I acted as though we were selling soap. Or soft drinks. Or a political candidate. I thought we just needed to sell the benefits of “the Christian life” — in the vaguest of terms — and then hope people stuck around to get baptized and then become part of the church.

I thought we were making a one-time sale to people — getting their ticket punched for heaven — and then nothing much mattered after we counted up our converts and baptisms. If we had a bunch of people being baptized and joining the church, that was success.

I wouldn’t have said any of that, but I acted that way. I now understand just how spiritually bankrupt my approach was, because I now see how little I understood about God. My religious training hadn’t really demanded much out of me. We were expected to be morally good people — and that part was easy for me — but being a Christian didn’t really require much of me. That was about it.

My church involvement had nothing to do with a contemplative life of learning God’s spirit and seeking him. As for building loving community, we had what amounted to a happy social club of people who mostly lived socially conservative lives.

But I can’t say that anything about the life I experienced changed me on the inside. That’s what I wanted. I longed to be changed on the inside — “transformed by the renewal of your mind,” as the Apostle Paul wrote in his letter to the Romans — but I found little interest in such things from the adult leaders. They seemed interested in people learning Bible stories and in building our numbers, not to mention raising money to build buildings and buy nicer things.

We said all the right things. A lot of people genuinely believed they were doing the right thing. I understand now that all we had to sell was a socially conservative lifestyle — and membership in our happy little social club.

When I see churches doing marketing today, I believe they’re almost exactly like what I grew up with. They’re selling membership in a social group. They’re not selling the kind of powerful love and community in which caring people seek God together and try to live as Jesus taught.

It’s become popular for the church to use marketing which is indistinguishable from the kinds of sales pitches that are used for consumer products. You can get t-shirts which seem more like parody, but they’re seen by a lot of people as “outreach.”

I saw this electronic sign at a church near my house as I drove home tonight, flashing “Jesus 2020” among its various advertising messages. I’m sure the people who go to the church are nice people. I’m sure that whoever decided to put this “campaign slogan for Jesus” on their board meant well.

But there is no power in this faint imitation of a fallen world.

If we as Christians suddenly lived as Jesus taught his followers to live — and if we had the sort of humble love among ourselves that characterized the early followers — we wouldn’t have to sell anything. If we were truly what he taught us to be, people would be beating our doors down, demanding to know how we’re different — and how they can be like us.

Instead, we have people who grow up in a church and simply stay connected — or who feel a one-time tug inside that makes them eager to find God — but for the vast majority, it stops right there. Many of these people get baptized. Many go to churches, some regularly and others all the time. Some people live chaotic lives that have nothing to do with God, but feel the vague need to “get active in church” after they have children.

But very few ever find anything powerful in their spiritual lives, much less real spiritual community.

We need to stop imitating the world. We need to stop acting as though we’re marketing cars or soft drinks or a brand of soap.

We need to get really quiet and really humble. We need to shut out the ways of the world and develop loving communities where we can seek God’s spirit and come to understand how to live as Jesus wanted us to.

If we ever do that, the world will be changed. But before that can happen, we have to change ourselves. And we will never do that by imitating the tools and methods of this dysfunctional and hateful culture.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts