Don’t complain about debt when you borrow $35,000 to study puppetry

By David McElroy · November 7, 2011

Folks on the progressive left seem to see Joe Therrien’s story as a tragedy. I agree that it’s a tragedy, but for very different reasons than the ones laid out in the left-wing publication The Nation last week.

Therrien is a part of the Occupy Wall Street protests. Listen to his story and see if you can spot the tragic part.

Just a few years ago, Therrien had a full-time job as a drama teacher in a government-run elementary school in New York City. He was unhappy with the working conditions — too many students, not enough resources and lousy management — so he decided to go to graduate school instead. He spent the next three years studying his passion — puppetry — while he ran up $35,000 in debt.

After emerging from the University of Connecticut with a master’s degree in puppetry, he was apparently shocked to find that he couldn’t find a job. We all know that jobs for good puppeteers should be available pretty much anywhere, but the evil rich have dried up the market. Or something like that. Therrien says he couldn’t find a job, so he ended up applying for his old job at the NYC elementary school. As you might have heard, times are tough, so schools aren’t exactly creating new positions left and right, so he ended up taking a job as a full-time substitute teacher at his old school — at about half his former salary.

So what’s the tragedy here? The writer at The Nation seems to think it’s that there aren’t enough good jobs for puppeteers. (What other conclusion could we draw from the story?) The real tragedy, though, is that some guy left his full-time job — with good benefits and health insurance — in order to put himself $35,000 into debt to get a degree that’s practically worthless. And now he’s part of the Occupy Wall Street crowd whining that someone else is responsible for his predicament?

As far as I’m concerned, Therrien could be the poster child for what’s wrong with the attitudes of many of the Occupy Wall Street crowd. He created his own problem by taking risks to follow a dream, yet he wants to blame others when those risks didn’t pay off as he wanted them to.

I have no problem with people chasing dreams. I’ve done my share of risk-taking and I’ll do more than my share of it in the future. But when foolish risks don’t pan out, you accept that you lost your bet and you learn how to be an assistant manager at Burger King or something. (If you work your way up, you can make a nice living as a fast food manger.) You don’t become part of a naive movement that blames people whose jobs they don’t understand for economic problems they don’t understand. Yet this is the choice Therrien has made.

We live in a society where people are forgetting how to take responsibility for their own choices. They’ve been told for so long that someone else should take care of them — and that someone else will take care of them — that they don’t even understand the foolishness of what they’re doing. The people on the political left talk in language that makes little sense and has no coherent meaning. (Read the story at the link above and see what I mean.)

It’s time for a return to personal responsibility. If you want to take a risk to follow your dream, that’s great. But if it doesn’t work out, get to work on the next plan. Don’t spend weeks making puppets for left-wing political protests and complaining that nobody is giving you a job.

Share on Social Networks

We are ruled by the dumbest and most incompetent people among us — and we have a system which allows stupid and irresponsible people to force the costs of their idiocy onto smarter and wiser people. Can we get away with that? Yes, for quite some time. But we eventually reach a point at which the dumbest of the dumb — who are habitual liars and mentally ill fools — lead us to the disasters and destruction that some of us have seen coming for years. We are approaching that point. And yet most of the idiots around us still wave their rhetorical banners of support for the evil people who are leading us to ruin — and all of them point their fingers at someone else, never noticing that their own enthusiastic support of evil is to blame. When things finally fall apart, blame yourself for your blindness to the evil, not whoever happens to be in power when it happens.

I’ve been making some changes to the site lately and there are more changes coming in the days ahead, so don’t be surprised if you some small differences. This is not a wholesale redesign, but rather the addition of some features. Since they’re smarter than I am, I’ve put Oliver and Alex in charge of the technical work, which you can see in this action photo from the control room of our media complex. I recently added a series of landing pages for readers who randomly discover the site from an Internet search. I’ve also changed the YouTube link at the top of the page to go to the new YouTube channel for video essays that reflect things I’ve already published here. (Here’s a little bit about both of the YouTube channels I’m working on.) In addition, I’m trying to move away from using Instagram, so I’m experimenting with photo plug-ins that will eventually allow me to host the pictures — cats, dogs, sunsets, whatever — that I often take. So don’t be surprised to see more changes. Thanks for your patience. Let’s hope Alex and Oliver know what they’re doing.

I have no use for the theocratic and repressive government of Iran. The people who run the country are cruel at best and evil at worst. The Iranian people deserve freedom. But I have no personal quarrel with anybody in Iran. While I’m not thrilled about a future Iranian government having nuclear weapons, I’m just as concerned about nukes in the hands of politicians in Israel, Pakistan, India, China and Russia. I’m not even thrilled with the U.S., Britain and France having them, either, because I don’t trust any politicians to be responsible with such terrible weapons. All I can say with certainty is that American taxpayers have no business attacking Iran, especially since we’re being forced to pay for this attack in order to benefit the politicians of Israel — and nobody else. If Middle Eastern countries want to fight among themselves, that’s none of my business. It’s not the business of the U.S. government, either. I have no quarrel with anybody in Iran — and having the government which claims to represent me launch an unprovoked attack against a sovereign country will only make all Americans less safe in the near future. This attack is poorly conceived and morally unjustified. Remember that when the Iranians launch attacks that we will then condemn as “terrorism.” What the U.S. is doing right now looks like terrorism to me. And let’s not forget that the attack is the latest in a long line of unconstitutional wars by various U.S. presidents — who have no legal power to declare war on their own, according to the U.S. Constitution.

A child having a tantrum understands only one thing: Did I get my way or not? He doesn’t understand the issues involved. He doesn’t understand the reasons that went into a decision. He doesn’t understand any of the things that mature and reasonable adults have to understand in order to live healthy lives. By his reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down his disastrous tariff scheme, Donald Trump shows himself to be — once more — a screaming child having a tantrum. Outside the world of mob bosses who expect to get their way every time, normal adults don’t act this way, but Trump isn’t normal. He’s an angry and vengeful man who has narcissistic personality disorder. And we are in danger as a result. Trump doesn’t understand the legal issues involved in this ruling. He doesn’t understand economics. He doesn’t understand rule of law. He doesn’t understand that he can ever be wrong. All he understands is that he didn’t get his way. And he is now a narcissistic and raging little boy who also happens to hold life-and-death power over most humans on this planet. He’s dangerous — and the system which gives him that power is even more dangerous.

Is it an attempt to blur the gender line between men and women? Or is it some weird tribute to the traditional Scottish kilt? It’s hard to say, but fashion designers keep pushing for men to wear skirts in the last few years. Both men and women in modern fashion seem oddly androgynous, as though it would be offensive for a man to look manly or for a woman to look feminine. A CNN article about the latest fashions from Paris caught my attention Monday and left me wondering about the ugly clothes the designers are hawking. If a man wants to wear a skirt — or a kilt — that’s OK with me, but I’ll stick with a traditional dark suit with a white shirt and tie. (Well, when I’m not wearing t-shirts and sweats, of course.) I always wonder who actually buys the outlandish garb from fashion designers anyway. I would be humiliated to be seen in any of this stuff, but I obviously have no sense of high fashion.

Related Posts