Despite ‘OccupyBF’ rhetoric, local shoppers say no one dictates to them

By David McElroy · November 25, 2011

If you believe the organizers behind the misguided effort called Occupy Black Friday, Americans go on an orgy of consumer spending because it’s the “one day where the mega-corporations blatantly dictate our actions.” So they’re organizing a boycott of stores to “hit the corporations that corrupt and control American politics where it hurts, their profits.”

There’s also a Stop Black Friday website, which sounds suspiciously like the Grinch drumming his fingers nervously as he says, “I must find some way to stop Christmas from coming.”

The boycott includes giants such as Walmart, Target and Dick’s Sporting Goods, as well as lesser-known chains such as Dollar Tree. (Does anyone really go to Black Friday sales at Dollar Tree?) Since this group is convinced that people are doing what “corporations” are dictating, I went over to the Target near my house Thursday evening to talk to people standing in line waiting for sales to start at 10 p.m. I’m happy to report that I couldn’t find an oppressed person in the bunch.

Rebecca was in line with her 17-year-old daughter, Jennifer. I explained to them that some activists on Facebook say that Target and other corporations are dictating their actions, and Rebecca laughed.

“The only way someone ‘dictates’ my actions is if they have something I want to buy at a price I want to pay,” Rebecca said. “I’m out here tonight because I can save some money on things I want to buy anyway. This is going to be a major portion of what I’m going to spend for Christmas presents, and I’m saving money to do it this way. It’s pretty arrogant for some ignorant yahoos to claim I’m only here because someone forced me to. I’m here because it’s in my best interests — to get what I want.”

I told Rebecca that the online group claims that everyone should be shopping at local, independent retailers instead of bigger stores.

“I don’t care who owns a store,” she said. “I want what I want at the best price. If Target has it, that’s fine. If one of the little shops down the street has it, that’s fine, too. I don’t have a political agenda. I just want to deal with whoever can give me what I want without breaking me.”

Not everyone I talked with was as articulate and outspoken as Rebecca, but nobody felt that any company was dictating what he or she had to buy.

“That’s silly,” said Ronald, a 62-year-old who had accompanied his wife just so she wouldn’t wait in the cold alone. “Some people think we just go buying everything they show on TV, but that’s not the case. It it was true, I guess all the ads on TV would work — and they’re all the time advertising stuff that dies because nobody buys it. We buy what we want and don’t buy what we don’t like. We vote with our dollars.”

When I was outside the store around 6:30 Thursday evening, I counted 54 people in line. The group was an interesting demographic mix. In addition to the other suburban white folks who live nearby, there were quite a few — nearly half – who were blacks who had come from more urban, lower-income parts of Birmingham. Arionna had some definite feelings about the idea of avoiding big stores and shopping at small local merchants instead.

“Do they know how much things cost at those little stores in my neighborhood?” Arionna asked. “I can’t get the kind of stuff there that I want and the prices for what they have are two or three times as much. And they people are rude to you and the place is dirty. Now why would I want to give those people my money when I can come to a clean store and pay half the price? I got four girls and I can’t afford to feed them and put clothes on them if I don’t save every dollar I can. I’m going to buy where my money gets the most and I don’t care who owns it.”

I couldn’t find anybody who felt as though the “big corporations” were dictating anything to them, but maybe they’ve all been brainwashed by seeing too many television commercials and don’t realize they’re marching lockstep as they’re told.

One of the best points I heard tonight was from the older guy who pointed out that big companies frequently introduce products that fail. How do the Occupy Black Friday people explain that? How do they explain the fact that many companies go bankrupt when they don’t offer people what they want at competitive prices? Why do Occupy Black Friday organizers believe people should make the choices they dictate — instead of the choices that make the most sense to the individuals?

The Occupy Black Friday people sound like socialists to me. If you read their Facebook page, their language sounds really compatible with what you’d find in run-of-the-mall socialist literature. Of the three people they mention in their “likes” on Facebook, two are outright socialists and the third may as well be: Bernie Sanders, Noam Chomsky and Michael Moore.

The kind of people behind Occupy Black Friday are the ones who want to dictate to people. Companies such as Target and Walmart don’t have any power to dictate anything to you. They’ll beg you to come shop with them. They’ll try to tailor their offerings to be what you want. But they’re not going to give you sanctimonious lectures if you don’t make the choices they want you to make.

I won’t be shopping anywhere Friday — whether it’s with big companies or small, local shops. Frankly, I think people would all be better off if they spent less of their money on consumer goods and saved more of it instead (preferably in hard assets). I live pretty simply and don’t really understand most of the consumer shopping that most people do.

But that’s just me. I do what I want with my money. You do what you want with your money. That’s the way it should be — regardless of what either governments or socialist protesters want.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts