I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

I wanted to be Capt. James Kirk; have I become Ignatius J. Reilly?
I need a romantic partner who’s already facing her inner demons
A muse is a crutch for an artist, but some need a crutch to walk
Here’s the jobs growth Obama promised—in federal workers
Youth and death are bookends pointing toward truth between
Donald Trump’s jingoistic tribalism marks him as a dangerous buffoon
Unexpected proposal leaves me pondering my craving to be loved
VIDEO: Was it ridiculous that I had to learn good manners as a child?