
Do people forward you as much political “humor” as they send to me? Since I started publishing this site, I get even more of it.
Just this week, different people sent me the two graphics here. One person sent a batch of anti-Republican stickers asking if I could use them. And then I got a batch of anti-Democratic graphics from another friend, with a note saying, “I didn’t know if you could use any of these graphics on your website or not. Very good bumper stickers.”
I appreciate my friends’ good intentions. I really do. (In fact, a few of you send me things that do turn into article ideas. You know who you are. Thanks.) But politics is already vacuous enough without dumbing it down even further. This isn’t what I want to be about. I don’t want to be “room noise” or “elevator music,” to steal a couple of phrases from an obscure old song.
Simplistic sloganeering such as what you see here doesn’t help anyone. Honestly, I don’t even find it funny. I will gladly take something I disagree with and write about why I think someone is wrong. I realize that some people don’t appreciate that — as was discussed in the comments of that article — but it’s a balance I try to strike between ideas, on the one hand, and attracting new readers, on the other. But most of what I see offered as political discourse today strikes me as the equivalent of children on a playground shouting insults at one another.
I like Ron Paul, but he’s not winning (and I don’t believe in the system)
Why do American Christians impose their own political beliefs on God?

Nightmarish dreams mean dead can continue to play mind games
What kind of person are you if there’s not a word to define you?
What kind of sick society names Obama, Clinton its most admired?
Her dad didn’t want to help her, so here’s a jack-o’-lantern for Hannah
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Lucy, the dog who used to live on a chain
Humans are most heroic in small moments of caring for each other