Since at least the 1960s, the John Birch Society has been fighting a lonely battle to get the United States to pull out of the United Nations and kick the UN out of New York City. If you don’t know anything about the John Birchers, they’re an interesting bunch. They’ve always believed in a world of conspiracies and communists under every rock. When it comes to the UN, though, it just might be that the Birchers had it right from the start.
The United Nations is now calling for confiscating wealth from the “super rich” in relatively prosperous countries in order to send it to poor countries. It’s not an income tax. The proposal is to confiscate 1 percent of the wealth of billionaires. It’s simple theft of an estimated $400 billion in order to send it to corrupt and repressive governments that have run their people into the ground.
I’m not worried about alleged conspiracies for a “new world order” or a fictitious “North American Union.” But I am worried about the fact that more and more people want the UN to function as a world government. A UN agency has recently proposed that it take over the management of the Internet, and the agency chief admitted that part of the purpose is to make sure that small countries’ telecom monopolies are able to make money — by preventing other ways of getting data in and out of the country. Doesn’t that sound like a great excuse for repressive governments?

Goodbye, Sonny
The best romantic relationships end up becoming mutual rescue
Moral principle: What you do with your money is your business
California pays $205,075 to move shrub that typically sells for $16
Identity politics is the cancer behind Elizabeth Warren’s lie about ancestry
Federal control of Internet security would put Barney Fife in charge
If you start at love, it’s easier to get to hate than to indifference
Gloria Allred wants free speech for her, but not for Rush Limbaugh
Being hermit looks good as world tries to make me a misanthrope