I had a realization Wednesday night that seems profound, but I can’t think of any way to say it that won’t make me sound like an idiot or a fool. Maybe both.
Becoming the man I need to be — especially in the spiritual sense — is about addition, not subtraction.
If I visualize my life as a complex object or machine or organism, I have always seen myself as defective. I haven’t been fully conscious of this. As I’ve tried sincerely to improve myself and become who God wanted me to be, I’ve seen it as a matter of removing defective parts.
Everything about what I learned as a child — both at home and at church — oriented me toward this unconscious model.
At home, I constantly heard everything that was wrong with me. Everything that I needed to stop doing. At church, I learned all the ways that sin made us unacceptable to God. The lessons I learned from these two centers of my development taught me that I could be acceptable to God and to my family by closely following a set of rules.
I internalized those rules that I needed to follow, both from my family and from my church. Those rules became part of my core operating assumptions about life. Compared to most people I knew, I was very good at obeying all of those rules to the letter.
But what I overlooked was something much more profound.
As I followed all of the rules I was taught — and became closer and closer to being what everyone else seemed to call “good,” I wasn’t adequately replacing the “defective parts.”
I was removing the things I could call sin or bad behavior, but I wasn’t replacing what I removed with a truly changed heart.
I didn’t truly know how to love. Not God. Not others. Not even myself.

VIDEO: Take a break from crisis with a 90-second parody video
‘Let’s Make a Deal’: Democracy is like a dumb old TV game show
‘Duck Dynasty’ just another skirmish in an increasingly stupid culture war
Could ‘free cities’ — existing inside more restrictive states — be a first step toward freedom?
Meeting with dead man left me pondering choices of life, death
In the old Ginger or Mary Ann debate, I wanted a third choice