Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

My father taught me not to trust; that’s been very tough to change
Predictions of doom keep failing, so isn’t it rational to doubt them?
Goodbye, Daddy
How can people who care really help the billions mired in deep poverty?
Our methods of selling politicians seem designed for mental defectives
Why do Birmingham taxpayers give $500,000 yearly to college sports?
It’s OK to volunteer for tornado cleanup, but only if you’re not a pro
If God had caused Tim Tebow to win, did He change His mind Saturday?
Unconscious programming makes us eager to believe our own lies