Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

Being in love shows us who we can choose to be at our very best
Love & Hope — Episode 9:
Dems, GOP name Charlotte Clinton and future Bush baby for 2056
Can I talk myself into not wanting great things I fear I’ll never have?
Surgery report: It went very well, but first time is one too many for me
Emptiness can bring panic that feels like being stalked by fear
Odd interest in UK’s royal family suggests remnant of need for ruler
If romantic love is real and true, does it never really fade away?
Hope can be dangerous when the path ahead is dark and uncertain