Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

Can love last? Man holding hand of his dying wife gives me hope
Collective freak-out over tasteless shirt points to double standard
Time and maturity should change what we believe we need in mates
New Star Trek film is reminder that adults aren’t running Hollywood
Plans change and people hurt us, but we often need to start over
Mundane expressions of love matter more than movie versions
If politics sends you into a rage, is it really a good use of your time?
Lennon had ‘wrong ambitions,’ but became cultural icon anyway
Life’s path can change direction when you’re ready for real love