Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

Drug raid in Birmingham points to folly and failure of the ‘drug war’
As we encounter emotional truth, poisonous past can make us numb
If you care about education — not just schooling — please read this paper right now
In England, Oxford City Council mandates video recording for taxis
We all live with a death sentence, but we act as if we’ll live forever
Left-wing distortions of church just as toxic as right-wing kinds
‘What’s the worth of one warm smile? Go and ask the dead man’
Despite advantages to digital books, there’s still nothing like ‘real’ books