The most painful battles I fight are with myself.
I have occasional conflicts with other people, of course, but those are easier to resolve or to ignore. I have to live with myself all the time. I have to live with the person I’ve decided to become today, but I also have to live with various versions of myself from the past. And those differing versions of me can often fight each other for control.
I’ve decided not to be argumentative and angry with other people online. It’s been a conscious decision not to live that way anymore, even though I used to have vicious verbal battles with others, on social media and on message boards before that.
I’ve learned that this sort of vicious argument doesn’t help anyone. I’ve learned that acting in those ways often makes me ignore my own values. And I’ve learned that the toxicity I can spew in one of those battles hurts me more than it hurts the person at whom the words are directed.
But when I feel attacked by someone — as I do tonight — I want to strike back. I have a foolish need to defend my pride. And I can be insecure enough to believe I need to strike back — or else other people won’t think I’m able to prove myself right.
Part of me knows that I need to walk away from such attacks, but another part of me — the person who still thinks and feels the way I used to — is eager to strike back in self-righteous anger.
The toxic inner battle between these parts of me — the person I’ve chosen to be and the person I used to be — leaves me feeling painful inner conflict about who I really am.

Vile human cost of war ignored by Americans playing political games
Sad husband: ‘My beautiful wife is dying; I’m so sad I can’t sleep’
Visit from his dead parents shook father’s disbelief in supernatural
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Briefly: Expect the unexpected as my site migrates to new servers this week
Hugs from a sweet little girl can erase stress after long work day
To see how I’ve changed over time, notice which women I’ve fallen for
Media bias: ‘They can state the facts while telling a lie’
It’s odd how ‘choice’ can mean ‘no choice’ with the state involved