Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

Cancer unexpectedly took Lucy before old age could finish her
Is Paul Krugman serious or is this some kind of weird performance art?
The Alien Observer: The Outrage Machine is destroying us all
My own question now faced me: ‘Would a healthy person do that?’
In winner-take-all systems, swing voters matter only at election time
We can’t defeat the existing system; we must build a better one instead
Smallest ray of hope can make us feel a change we need is coming
Turn off the Outrage Machine; focus on things you can control
What does it take to hold thug with a badge accountable for murder?