Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

French president wants to ban homework as unfair to poor kids
Jesus’ face on a Walmart receipt? People see what they want to see
Tradeoffs about values leave me feeling like ‘double-minded man’
Turkey pardon? How about pardons for jailed innocent people instead?
Movie popcorn overpriced? Sue ’em; spoiled children want their way
Life choices: What’s important enough to spend your life doing?
If elections could bring freedom, voting would have been outlawed
Financial crisis seems serious when it hits your own neighbors
If you start at love, it’s easier to get to hate than to indifference