I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

The so-called ‘social contract’ just means ‘the rest of us own you’
Am I betraying the truth if I don’t preach to the converted each day?
What if most money spent for university degrees is useless?
Ellie Kemper ‘witch-hunt’ shows why it’s hard to fight real racism
I’d be thrilled if Ron Paul were elected, but I won’t vote for him
Confirmation bias means most of us assume our opponents are ‘morans’
So you’ve rescued dogs and cats, but how about a baby elephant?
I’m waiting for life to begin, but I’m feeling lost and alone tonight