I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

Starved for love: Portrait of a plastic person living a little plastic life
Leopards might not change spots, but cowardly lions can gain courage
New YouTube channel launched for video versions of my essays
Lack of ability to think plays a role in public acceptance of higher taxes
If a bad relationship needs to end, fake Facebook posts won’t fool us
We can’t trade away gun rights and believe it’ll give kids perfect safety
Trump’s rabid defenders selling their souls for a narcissistic liar
Peace won’t come until you quit obeying long-gone programmers