For most of my life, I had generally avoided novels written before I was born. They were stodgy. The language was outdated. They were boring. Even if they were significant in the historical sense, I saw them as the literary equivalent of reading the King James Version of the Bible.
I was wrong, of course, but I didn’t realize that until the last decade or so. I first started reading English translations of some Russian classics. I came to love Leo Tolstoy’s “Anna Karenina” and Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov,” among others.
Then a friend introduced me to German novelist Hermann Hesse. To one extent or another, I found that I loved “Steppenwolf,” “Siddhartha,” “Narcissus and Goldmund” and “The Glass Bead Game.” I’ve read “Narcissus and Goldmund” four times so far — and I keep finding new things to appreciate about it.
But I was slow to appreciate the English writer Charles Dickens — and I’ve come to understand that this has meant depriving myself of a kind of literary joy that I haven’t experienced for a long time. I just finished the Dickens novel, “David Copperfield,” a few hours ago — and I’d like to suggest that this book is better than almost any fiction that’s been written since I was born.
I’m left feeling serious regret that I’ve had such a huge hole in my education about literature and human existence.

We like to think we’re complex, but personality gurus pegged me
Christmas stands for quiet truths: love, faith, community and family
Thirst for love and understanding drives all of us until it’s quenched
Painful longing is too powerful to express heart’s anguish in words
Until we experience awakening, we’re blind to truth in our hearts
Unmet childhood needs trigger addiction as I try to fill inner hole
We often act like madmen who’re eagerly bent on self-destruction
Urban Meyer’s drunken behavior points to deeper character issues
Jalen Hurts’ team-first attitude is antidote to ESPNization of sports