For most of my life, I had generally avoided novels written before I was born. They were stodgy. The language was outdated. They were boring. Even if they were significant in the historical sense, I saw them as the literary equivalent of reading the King James Version of the Bible.
I was wrong, of course, but I didn’t realize that until the last decade or so. I first started reading English translations of some Russian classics. I came to love Leo Tolstoy’s “Anna Karenina” and Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov,” among others.
Then a friend introduced me to German novelist Hermann Hesse. To one extent or another, I found that I loved “Steppenwolf,” “Siddhartha,” “Narcissus and Goldmund” and “The Glass Bead Game.” I’ve read “Narcissus and Goldmund” four times so far — and I keep finding new things to appreciate about it.
But I was slow to appreciate the English writer Charles Dickens — and I’ve come to understand that this has meant depriving myself of a kind of literary joy that I haven’t experienced for a long time. I just finished the Dickens novel, “David Copperfield,” a few hours ago — and I’d like to suggest that this book is better than almost any fiction that’s been written since I was born.
I’m left feeling serious regret that I’ve had such a huge hole in my education about literature and human existence.

Some of us feel rage at authority, even as disobedience can hurt us
If you were once a nerdy outsider, you need to go see ‘Ender’s Game’
Why waste your one life on political scandal that won’t change anything?
Unexpected proposal leaves me pondering my craving to be loved
My love of ‘fur friends’ stems from the callousness I saw in my father
I’m writing a book — and I’ll be talking about it as it progresses
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Getting better at all I do is only way to fight ‘imposter syndrome’
Existing biases dictate how you see grand jury decision in Ferguson, Mo.