We’ve seen beyond a shadow of doubt that the Occupy Wall Street protesters don’t understand economics and don’t understand the source of our financial problems. Until now, though, I could say, “But at least they all understand bailing out the banks was a bad idea.” Unfortunately, even that was too charitable.
The first professional survey data about the protesters is out, and the information is pretty interesting. The thing that really jumped out at me, though, was the news that half of the protesters believe the big bank bailouts were necessary.
So let’s try to wrap our heads around this. They are angry that the banks got our money, so they’re protesting there. But a full half of the protesters believe it was necessary for the government to give billions and billions of dollars to the banks. How do their heads not explode from holding this contradiction inside?
Do these people not understand that businesses which take unwise chances and lose deserve to go out of business? Do they not understand that what economist Joseph Schumpeter called “creative destruction” is necessary for the market to work?
The survey from which this information comes was done by long-time Democratic Party pollster Douglas Schoen. Anyone who’s under the illusion that these are just frustrated mainstream types hurting from the bad economy needs to listen to what Schoen writes about them:
Perfect time for reaching a goal can be right after you’ve given up
Personal growth feeds a romance, but lack of honesty destroys love
Change sometimes happens slowly, not in the grand leap that we want
What’s the use of love if the one who you love doesn’t need you?
EU says it might block people from getting their own money from banks
Suicide ends pain of depression, but scars loved ones left behind
Goodbye, Emily (2009-2015)
Intuition sometimes tells you when someone is worth chasing
What if emotional baggage we carry isn’t really our core issue?