I’m trapped in a society where all the important public figures are middle schoolers.
Not actual middle schoolers, of course. Many of the loudest and most influential voices in our culture are wealthy executives, media personalities, political leaders and adults with millions of followers. But the most popular and prominent of them behave with the emotional maturity of a 12-year-old trying to dominate a cafeteria conversation.
Every disagreement becomes a playground fight. Every issue becomes tribal. Every insult demands retaliation. Every thought must be expressed immediately. Every opinion must be performed publicly. Every emotional reaction becomes content.
And the louder, more impulsive and more outrageous someone behaves, the more visibility that person receives.
That’s not happening by accident.
Years ago, media critic Neil Postman warned that television was transforming public life into entertainment. (Read Postman’s “Amusing Ourselves to Death.” Please.) Television rewarded personalities more than ideas. It rewarded emotional immediacy more than thoughtful reflection. Politics, journalism, education and religion all slowly began adapting themselves to the demands of a medium built primarily for amusement.
But television now seems almost quaint — and downright intellectual — compared to what came afterward.
Social media didn’t merely continue those trends. It automated and intensified them.

Experimentation produces beauty that won’t come from slavishly following One True Way
What if all truth and all beauty can be traced back to one source?
Dems, GOP name Charlotte Clinton and future Bush baby for 2056
Tired of Obama? Electing Romney or another Republican won’t help
I kinda like Rand Paul, but I don’t support anybody as ruler-in-chief
Good riddance, UAB football: Taxes shouldn’t subsidize college sports
Group conflict isn’t as simple as tales of good guys vs. bad guys
Life has a brutal habit of forcing us to confront our own hypocrisy