I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

You can change your story, but you first must throw away the old ones
The ‘man in the mirror’ always turns out to be our worst enemy
Suppressing speech you don’t like is a lousy way to encourage tolerance
In a world full of hate and hurt, love must be a conscious choice
Want to feel happier, healthier? Try cutting back on your deceit
Being loved is one of life’s gifts, but joy of loving is even greater
‘Just do exactly what we say to do; it’s for your own good, you know’
Goodbye, Daddy
Why do American Christians impose political beliefs on God?