I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
Will Honduras establish the first modern free city? It’s possible
Personal growth feeds a romance, but lack of honesty destroys love
Why do American Christians impose political beliefs on God?
Why not join the LP? You can’t fight the state by becoming the state
Jalen Hurts’ team-first attitude is antidote to ESPNization of sports

Now that his threat is truly gone,
What if most money spent for university degrees is useless?