There’s something wrong with the “justice” system when a jury convicts a man of a crime, but sends a note to the judge saying, “We’ve all reached a verdict. To us we feel he has been wronged. Please consider that in his sentencing.”
In other words, the jury felt that the accused was actually the victim in the case, but they still did what the judge and prosecutor told them to do. That’s wrong. (They’ve probably never heard of jury nullification, because judges work pretty hard to make sure jurors aren’t aware of their real rights and responsibilities.)
A Texas jury convicted a man of resisting arrest after police mistook him for a burglar and broke into his home — and he tried to escape from them. Police say a neighbor reported — wrongly — seeing a black male kicking in a door to the house. For some odd reason, this Hispanic man apparently didn’t trust that police who had just broken into his own home had his best interests at heart.
The man’s attorney says his client has the mind of a child and also struggles with the English/Spanish language barrier, but I’d say the guy showed good judgement in resisting the people who were breaking in and trying to grab him, whether they were dressed in police costumes or not.
Goodbye, Thomas (1994-2012)
Yes, I truly appreciate your flaws; they point the way to your worth
Do I oppose rulers because I hate rulers — or because I hate rules?
Path to loving a woman always starts with intimidation for me
Uh, oh: For first time since ’45, U.S. job growth was zero last month
How to exploit school kids to get elected to almost any office
Race discrimination: Sometimes evil, but sometimes praiseworthy?
What kind of savages are we today? ‘Pick ’em out and knock ’em out’
What makes good science fiction? Aya Katz and I discuss ‘Podkayne’