If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

‘I know who you are,’ she said. ‘Do you know who you really are?’
Don’t believe angry words and deception from a wounded heart
I finally know why I feel like a fraud when people say I’m smart
Try a new game: Make others smile — and let yourself smile with them
By end of Pooh movie, I wanted to stay in the Hundred-Acre Wood
Why do we ‘need’ the newest thing? Is that where people get their joy?
Beauty and love are all around us if our eyes and hearts are open to them
Did GOP and Democrats get their scripts mixed up this time?