When Somali’s parliament unanimously agreed two years ago to make Islamic sharia law the basis of their country’s legal system, it was a clear demonstration of democracy in action. That’s a picture of the happy vote. At the same time, it was a serious limitation on individual freedom. So which matters? Democracy or freedom?
Most people mistakenly believe that freedom and democracy are the same things. I’ve talked about this before. The U.S. government is clearly confused about the issue, though. It uses our tax money around the world to support rebellions that will supposedly bring about democracy in more and more places. But if the vast majority of people want something other than freedom — and they want to enact laws to repress other people — why is this a good thing?
The latest example of this is in Libya. The United States spent $1.1 billion over throwing the old dictator (and other western powers spent even more), but there are worrisome signs that the new people aren’t exactly interested in individual liberty. The head of the new Libyan government said over the weekend that sharia law is going to be the foundation of the new country’s law. The same was true under the old regime, but the new regime is signaling that it’s going to go even further in forcing people to behave as their version of good Muslims — or else.
Shouldn’t standards be higher for those trusted to enforce our laws?
VIDEO: What if this is Trump’s 2026 remake of Groundhog Day?
Briefly: Sufjan Stevens album always evokes old feelings about my mother
Suicide ends pain of depression, but scars loved ones left behind
Without things to look forward to, the human heart gets ready to die
A year later, my father’s death looms large, but I have no regrets
Suicide’s what happens when you can’t find reasons to keep living
We’ve become a nation of wimps just waiting around to feel offended
16-year-old charged with felony for science experiment gone bad