I was sad to see the news that Rachel Held Evans has died at just 37 years old. She had an allergic reaction to an antibiotic last month which led to her death early Saturday morning. Evans was born into an Evangelical Christian home in Birmingham and eventually became a popular writer as a progressive left Christian instead. I learned something interesting from her work, but it wasn’t what she intended. I looked at her books and found nothing interesting or persuasive in them, so I was curious why she had such a following. Then I had an epiphany which I should have had years ago. People follow writers not because their brilliant writing changes the readers’ minds. (Not generally.) Readers follow writers with whom they identify. Evans’ personal experience of moving from conservative Christianity to being a progressive politically and liberal theologically resonated with people who had gone through similar transitions. If you follow a writer, it’s not because he’s changed your mind, but because you identify with him or somehow feel an emotional connection that others might not understand. That’s what I learned from Evans. She connected deeply with others who had gone through the same change she experienced.
Briefly
Briefly: Knowledge is worthless if those who need it can’t hear
I often feel like Professor Faber from Ray Bradbury’s brilliant novel “Fahrenheit 451.” He understood what had happened to his society and culture. He understood the intellectual and psychological way out of the mess, but he lived alone and watched in fear and despair as his society kept sinking deeper and deeper into an abyss. He saw and understood what many others needed to know, but he had no way of communicating the message to them — because he couldn’t compete with the shallow entertainment which had buried serious thought by those such as him. That doesn’t mean I have all the answers, any more than a scared and despairing Faber did. It just means I know how people could choose to dig themselves out of the shallow and emotionally empty world they’ve created for themselves. But they’re too busy laughing at the White Clown to pay attention. (Please read the book and think about it. The book isn’t about censorship, despite what your English teacher might have once told you. It’s about modern life and your choices.)
Briefly: Some people shouldn’t be trusted to influence children
In a restaurant, I just heard a mother angrily call her son — about 6 years old — a “bastard” and threaten to take his dinner away from him. He was so obviously scared that it makes me wonder what things are like at home when outsiders aren’t watching. There was a father with them, but he didn’t say a word the whole time. Some people shouldn’t reproduce — and others can’t be trusted to raise children in loving and healthy ways. Those are the people who typically pass along their dysfunction to the next generation, and they often wonder why their children are so hostile and unhappy after the kids get old enough to understand what happened to them.

Briefly: Almost half of Americans now favor some form of socialism
Briefly: It’s when my ego is quiet that I lose my fears of going my own way
Briefly: Being lonely has little to do with whether people are around us
Briefly: Living with loss of love hurts, but forgetting real love would be worse
Briefly: Man’s lonely death is chilling reminder that we need those we love
Briefly: Why do you care about tiff between Chris Rock and Will Smith?
Briefly: Women overestimate men’s attraction to skinny bodies
Briefly: Running away from home sometimes has a happy ending
Briefly: Article I wrote about missing someone still connects with tens of thousands